Open Access

The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in soils in the Region of Valasske Mezirici, the Czech Republic

  • Daniela Plachá1Email author,
  • Helena Raclavská2,
  • Dalibor Matýsek2 and
  • Mark H Rümmeli3
Geochemical Transactions200910:12

DOI: 10.1186/1467-4866-10-12

Received: 6 March 2009

Accepted: 14 December 2009

Published: 14 December 2009

Abstract

The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contamination of urban, agricultural and forest soil samples was investigated from samples obtained in the surroundings of Valasske Mezirici. Valasske Mezirici is a town located in the north-east mountainous part of the Czech Republic, where a coal tar refinery is situated. 16 PAHs listed in the US EPA were investigated. Organic oxidizable carbon was also observed in the forest soils. The PAH concentrations ranged from 0.86-10.84 (with one anomalous value of 35.14) and 7.66-79.39 mg/kg dm in the urban/agricultural and forest soils, respectively. While the PAH levels in the urban/agricultural soils are within the range typically found in industrialized areas, the forest soils showed elevated PAH concentrations compared to other forest soils in Western and Northern Europe. The PAH concentrations and their molecular distribution ratios were studied as functions of the sample location and the meteorological history. The soils from localities at higher altitudes above sea level have the highest PAH concentrations, and the PAH concentrations decrease with increasing distance from the town.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1467-4866-10-12/MediaObjects/12932_2009_Article_105_Figa_HTML.gif

1. Background

Many sites in the Czech Republic have been negatively affected by industrial pollution. The town of Valasske Mezirici and its surroundings, in the northeast of the republic, is one of these sites. In the 1960s, a coal tar refinery was established there. Coal tar refineries are known sources of pollution; among the pollutants they produce are various organic compounds, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs).

The PAHs form a group of chemical compounds that are ubiquitous in the environment [1]. These compounds are well known for their characteristic properties, such as toxicity and carcinogenity, environmental persistence and tendency for bioaccumulation [15]. They form through the incomplete combustion or pyrolysis of organic matter, and their release into the atmosphere is connected with energy and heat production, local heating facilities, vehicle exhausts, refuse burning, coke ovens, and so on. They also enter the environment via natural processes such as volcanic activity or forest and prairie fires [6, 7]. After being emitted into the atmosphere, they are redistributed between the gas and particle phases, and subsequently deposited to the terrestrial environment through dry or wet deposition [8]. Before being deposited, they can be transported over long distances.

Thus, the soil is contaminated with PAHs mainly from atmospheric depositions, directly or via vegetation, or in the case of arable soil with biowaste used as fertilizers [2]. Soil contamination by PAHs is considered to be a good indicator of the level of environmental pollution by human activities [8, 9]. It can provide information on regional pollution sources, the long-range transport of PAHs, the rates of pollutant retention and their ultimate destination [10, 11].

The aim of this paper is to investigate the occurrence of PAHs in urban and agricultural soils that are directly impacted by human activity (urban/agricultural soils) and in forest topsoils in the Valasske Mezirici Region in the Czech Republic, in the vicinity of a coal tar refinery and carbon black production. This information on PAH distribution can be used for health risk assessment and future urban development.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Site location and description

The study area is located in the northeast of the Czech Republic, in the district of Zlin (Figure 1). The town of Valasske Mezirici is situated at the foothills of the Moravian-Silesian Beskydy Mountains, the Hostyn Hills and the Vsetin Hills, near the confluence of the Roznov Becva and the Vsetin Becva Rivers (49°27' - 49°30'N and - 18°0' E), at altitudes 400-17°56' 600 m above sea level. The surface area is 5,481 ha [12]. According to the general ten-year wind data (Figure 2), the prevailing wind direction is from the south (30.8%), followed by calm (17.2%) and northerly wind direction (12.60%). The other wind directions account for up to 10% of the data. The eastern wind direction has the lowest frequency.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1467-4866-10-12/MediaObjects/12932_2009_Article_105_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

The local landscape around the town of Valasske Mezirici town and the coal tar refinery. Some altitudes are marked (in orange).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1467-4866-10-12/MediaObjects/12932_2009_Article_105_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

The ten-year wind rose in the Valasske Mezirici Region.

The town is an important industrial center and a significant railway and road junction, with a relatively high traffic density. The main industrial source of PAH pollution is the coal tar refinery (DEZA Corporation) and the carbon black production plant (CABOT CS). Both of these sources are located in the north of the town (Figure 1). DEZA a.s. is the only Czech producer of aromatic hydrocarbons that are obtained by processing coal tar and benzol. The annual processing capacity of DEZA is 160,000 Mt of crude benzol and 450,000 Mt of crude coal tar. The company's business is processing coal tar, mixed tar oils, benzol and raw materials for the production of phenols. Coal tars are composed of hundreds of organic compounds: aromatic compounds, including PAHs, heterocyclic PAHs, phenols, benzene, toluene, and xylenes, as well as aliphatic and polar hydrocarbons, but the chemical composition of coal tar may vary as a function of many factors, including feed stock, plant operating conditions and weathering once released to the environment [13, 14].

The products of DEZA are mainly aromatic hydrocarbons - benzene, toluene, mixtures of xylenes, phenols, cresols, and xylenols - followed by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons - anthracene, carbazol and naphthalene, phthalic anhydride, dioctyl phthalate. Coal tar pitch is also among their important products. The company is the supplier of raw materials for the production of carbon black in the affiliated company CS-CABOT [15]. According to the Czech Integrated pollution register, the company reported annual naphthalene emissions of 50,000 kg. The emitted quantities of the other PAH compounds are not reported [16].

2.2 Sampling of soils and analytical methods

Forty samples were collected for the determination of the PAH distribution in soils from the area of Valasske Mezirici. Twenty samples were collected from urban grass-covered and agricultural soils in the town and in its nearest surroundings. Agricultural soil refers to soil that is used for agricultural uses, for example, soil for food production, pasture land and grassland. Urban soil refers to soil not used for agriculture, occurring in the territory of the urban settlement. In this context, it represents soil in town gardens, soil along the roads and road junctions, parking places, and so on. These type of soils are affected by human activities [17, 18]. The sampling sites were selected in order to reflect the diverse exposure of soils to the pollution sources and dominant wind directions. They represent samples directly affected by industrial emissions, and directly subjected to transport and/or local heating emissions.

Twenty samples were collected from the humus layer of forest soils on the hill slopes in the surroundings of the town; 15 in coniferous forests and 5 in mixed forests. The sampling sites were also selected to represent a diversity of dominant wind directions.

The sampling sites are shown in Figure 3 and described in Tables 1 and 2. The sampling procedure, the physical sample preparations and the representative sample division were accomplished by using simple random shallow sampling according to Tan (2005) and ISO 10381-4:2003 and ISO 10381-5:2005 [1921]. The samples were collected from the surface layer (from A-horizon of 0-10 cm depth), after removing grass in urban/agricultural soil and needles and litter in forest soil. Approximately 2 kg of material were collected from a square area of 10 × 10 m in each sampling site. All samples were put into glass containers with a minimum headspace of air, and immediately transported to the laboratory. In each series of samples, one sample was collected to the depth of the A- and B- (14-50 cm) horizons.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1467-4866-10-12/MediaObjects/12932_2009_Article_105_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Locations of sampling sites in the Valasske Mezirici Region.

Table 1

Description of urban/agricultural soil sampling sites

Sample ID

Soil sample type

Altitude (m a.s.l.)

Coordinates X.Y

Direction*

pH/KCl

pH/H20

6

urban

441

499076

1138446

South-West

6,61

5,79

7

agricultural

427

498619

1137867

South

7,45

7,03

11

urban

181

495031

11440205

South-East

6,62

5,83

12

urban

409

494700

1138994

South-East

6,19

4,95

13

agricultural

192

497293

1136156

North

6,14

5,08

14

urban

403

496516

1138738

South

7,24

6,98

15

agricultural

350

496016

1136550

East

6,28

4,74

16

agricultural

352

496356

1134721

North

7,04

6,36

17

urban

316

496189

1140722

South

6,63

5,95

18

urban

318

497084

1141013

South

6,48

5,93

19

urban

336

496803

1139240

South

5,71

4,69

20

semi-urban

400

493484

1135740

North-East

6,10

5,06

41

urban

207

498198

1137905

South

6,73

5,83

54

agricultural

337

494944

1133779

North-East

6,80

5,76

78

agricultural

313

498421

1135172

North

5,55

4,62

108

agricultural

359

498827

1141290

South

6,13

5,28

109

urban

300

497943

1140006

South

7,68

7,12

116

agricultural

357

495296

1141360

South-East

6,60

5,68

137

urban

321

497250

119944

South

7,30

6,86

138

urban

404

495636

11338848

East

6,86

5,92

*direction from coal tar refinery

Table 2

Description of forest soil sampling sites

Sample ID

Altitude (m a.s.l.)

Coordinates X.Y

Direction*

Distance**

pH/KCl

pH/H20

Organic ox carbon (%)

1

400

495130.11

1133851.02

Nord

5,6

2,85

3,30

15,60

2

290

499432.48

1132383.39

Nord

7,0

2,88

3,35

18,01

3

275

500649.60

1136282.43

West

5,2

2,88

3,41

13.89

4

350

503261.27

1138848.46

West

6,5

3,06

3,51

11,05

5

400

502271.46

1141773.46

South-West

6,1

3,16

3,66

19,20

6

330

500403.36

1140301.10

South-West

3,8

3,06

3,59

10,25

7

500

499647.69

1142466.15

South

4,1

2,90

3,80

12,90

8

365

499887.02

1137853.47

West

3,6

3,35

3,84

10,31

9

400

498311.52

1138633.84

South

2,1

3,06

3,52

8,88

10

300

495502.65

1136669.43

East

3,1

2,81

3,24

16.45

11

295

498040.78

1135367.05

Nord-West

4,7

3,47

4,03

10,59

12

350

504876.07

1135413.47

West

9,3

3,23

3,71

10,31

13

450

495988.96

1143370.04

South

4,1

3,23

3,61

3,45

14

625

492916.90

1143460.66

South-East

5,7

3,10

3,48

13.54

15

670

491938.90

1149477.01

South

11,4

2,82

3,31

17.21

16

550

496606.90

1148941.20

South

9,7

3,04

3,49

15.78

17

400

502434.54

1146456.76

South

9,1

2,99

3,50

14.27

18

400

500554.75

1144153.94

South

6,4

2,74

3,26

18.91

20

400

493353.48

1137947.81

East

3,6

3,12

3,52

16.47

21

400

493050.59

1135369.90

Nord East

5,3

3,09

3,38

17.85

* direction from coal tar refinery

* *approximate distance of the middle town.

Analyses of 16 PAHs identified by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as priority pollutants were performed at the Institute of Public Health, The Department of Hygienic Laboratories in Frydek-Mistek, working in accordance with EN ISO/IEC 17025 and accredited by The Czech Accreditation Institute. The laboratory is the Czech National Reference Laboratory for Persistent Organic Pollutants.

All the solvents used (purchased from Sigma Aldrich) were of HPLC grade. The stock reference standard mixture of 16 PAH EPA 610 PAH MIX (Supelco Co., Cat. No. 48743), including naphthalene, acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, pyrene, benz [a]anthracene, chrysene, benzo [b]fluoranthene, benzo [k]fluoranthene, benzo [a]pyrene, indeno [1,2,3-cd]pyrene, dibenzo [a,h]anthracene and benzo [ghi]perylene of 100-2000 ng/ml in methanol, was used as an external calibration standard. The calibration was performed by direct injection of diluted standard solutions into GC or HPLC devices, and the regressions of peak areas against concentrations were calculated (R2 > 0.9998). The standards were simultaneously treated using all procedure steps to eliminate losses of PAH compounds during sample preparations and extractions. No surrogate standard was used, but matrix influence was followed for different PAH-spiked materials (sewage sludge, different soils, ashes, rubbish).

The limits of detection and measurement uncertainties for PAH compounds are shown in Table 3. The values of the limits of detection were derived 1) from the smallest integrable areas for each compound peaks in signal and 2) from the ratio between the analyte signal and the baseline noise (limit of detection = peak height/noise ratio of 3). The limits of detection were determined for contaminated soil matrices [22]. The measurement uncertainties are expanded uncertainties calculated by multiplying the combined standard uncertainties by a coverage factor k = 2 for an approximate level of confidence of 95% [23].
Table 3

Limit of detection and measurement uncertainty

PAHs

Limit of detection

mg/kg

Measurement uncertainty*

%

Naphthalene

0.050

30

Acenaphthylene

0.050

30

Acenaphthene

0.050

30

Fluorene

0.050

30

Phenanthrene

0.010

20

Anthracene

0.005

20

Fluoranthene

0.005

20

Pyrene

0.005

20

Benzo [a]anthracene

0.005

20

Chrysene

0.005

20

Benzo [b] fluoranthene

0.005

20

Benzo [k] fluoranthene

0.005

20

Benzo [a] pyrene

0.002

20

Dibenzo [a.h] anthracene

0.010

20

Benzo [ghi] perylene

0.005

20

Indeno [123-cd] pyrene

0.010

20

* The measurement uncertainties are expanded uncertainties calculated by multiplying the combined standard uncertainties by a coverage factor k = 2 for an approximate level of confidence of 95%.

A sufficient part of each sample was taken for the PAH extraction. The samples were not dried before extraction. The PAH compounds were extracted from the soil samples using a 1:1 (v:v) mixture of acetone and hexane in a Soxwav 3.6 microwave extractor (5 min of 20% microwave performance, following 55 min of 60% performance). The final extracts were filtered, dried with Na2SO4 and evaporated to produce near-dry residue. The residue was redissolved in 1 ml of hexane and divided into two aliquots; one half of the volume was used for gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis and the second half was analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography with fluorescence detector (HPLC/FD) after solvent exchange (hexane for methanol). The chromatographic analyses were performed using a GCQ/Polaris Q ThermoFinnigan gas chromatograph, equipped with a DB-5MS 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm column, and a Hewlett Packard Series 1100 liquid chromatograph with a fluorescence detector, equipped with a Merck LiChroCART 250-3 column. The GC/MS analysis was used for the determination of light PAHs - naphthalene, acenaphthene, acenaphthylene and fluorene; the other PAHs were analyzed by HPLC/FD method.

The dry matter content of each soil sample was determined after drying in an oven at 105 ± 3°C to constant weight. The organic oxidizable carbon (Cox) content (in percentage) was determined in each forest soil sample by the modified Walkley-Black (VB) dichromate methods [24]. The values were determined to be in the range 3.45-19.20% (Table 2). ISO 10390:2005 was used for the routine determination of pH using a glass electrode in a 1:5 (volume fraction) suspension of soil in water (pH in H2O) and 1 mol.l-1 potassium chloride solution (pH in KCl) (Table 1 and 2).

3. Results and discussion

3.1 PAH content in urban/agricultural soil

The results of the PAH analysis of urban/agricultural soil samples are shown in Tables 4, 5 in mg/kg dm, and the statistical evaluation appears in Table 6. The total concentrations of PAHs (viz. the selected 16 PAHs) varied from 0.861-10.840 mg/kg dm, with one anomalous value of 35.140 mg/kg dm; the arithmetic mean of the PAH concentrations was 5.527 mg/kg dm and the median was 3.370 mg/kg dm. Only the concentrations of those PAHs with values above the detection limits are calculated. The sum of 7 carcinogenic PAHs (according to IARC - benzo [a]anthracene, chrysene, benzo [b]fluoranthene, benzo [k]fluoranthene, benzo [a]pyrene, dibenzo [a,h]anthracene, indeno [1,2,3-cd]pyrene) ranged from 0.400 to 5.090 mg/kg dm, with one value of 16.000 mg/kg dm belonging to the anomalous PAH concentration. The sum of these 7 carcinogenic PAHs formed 40-57% of the total PAHs; only one sample from locality Krhova (ID sample 138) had the sum 30%. An analysis of the sample with A- and B-horizons is shown in Table 7. The observed values of the PAH concentrations in the B-horizon were similar to the concentrations in the A-horizon. The values were in the range that was observed for typical concentrations in urban soils (0.600-3.000 mg/kg), and they are higher than typical concentrations in forest and rural soils (up to 1.000 mg/kg) [25]. We do not know the full history of the site, but the relatively high PAH concentration values show an influence due to human activity. The concentrations of the carcinogenic fraction - benzo [a]pyrene were in the range of 0.06-2.25 mg/kg dm, with an arithmetic mean of 0.36 mg/kg dm and a median of 0.22 mg/kg dm.
Table 4

PAH concentrations in selected urban/agricultural soils

Sample ID/locality

6/Jurinka

7/Jurinka orchard

11/Valmez swimming pool

12/Hrachovec

13/Přiluky

14/Obora III

15/Bynina

16/Jasenice

17/Valmez hospital

18/Valmez South

PAHs

mg/kg dm

Naphthalene

0.100

0.400

0.190

0.120

0.720

0.100

0.140

0.130

0.470

1.050

Acenaphthylene

0.006

< 0.005

0.006

0.003

0.007

0.007

< 0.005

< 0.005

0.007

0.015

Acenaphthene

0.074

0.062

0.048

0.025

0.050

0.058

0.020

0.190

0.036

0.073

Fluorene

0.071

0.052

0.037

0.028

0.047

0.046

0.020

0.110

0.030

0.064

Phenanthrene

0.350

0.180

0.180

0.057

0.170

0.290

0.054

0.074

0.270

0.370

Anthracene

0.047

0.030

0.041

0.009

0.036

0.046

0.009

0.012

0.066

0.044

Fluoranthene

1.000

0.350

0.830

0.160

0.390

0.610

0.120

0.210

0.830

0.800

Pyrene

0.700

0.240

0.620

0.120

0.280

0.410

0.087

0.150

0.620

0.560

Benzo [a] anthracene

0.320

0.150

0.310

0.071

0.190

0.240

0.054

0.096

0.430

0.300

Chrysene

0.460

0.230

0.440

0.100

0.280

0.330

0.079

0.140

0.600

0.450

Benzo [b] fluoranthene

0.240

0.140

0.230

0.053

0.180

0.180

0.053

0.082

0.310

0.240

Benzo [k] fluoranthene

0.150

0.082

0.140

0.032

0.110

0.110

0.029

0.048

0.190

0.140

Benzo [a] pyrene

0.290

0.160

0.280

0.060

0.220

0.210

0.056

0.093

0.400

0.260

Dibenzo [a.h] anthracene

0.220

0.140

0.240

0.052

0.180

0.160

0.050

0.080

0.300

0.210

Benzo [ghi] perylene

0.070

0.039

0.063

0.012

0.050

0.048

0.011

0.019

0.093

0.055

Indeno [123-cd] pyrene

0.440

0.260

0.440

0.083

0.320

0.310

0.079

0.130

0.550

0.390

Σ 16 PAHs

4.538

2.515

4.095

0.985

3.230

3.155

0.861

1.564

5.202

5.021

Σ 7 carcinogenic PAHs

2.120

1.162

2.080

0.451

1.480

1.540

0.400

0.669

2.780

1.990

Table 5

PAH concentrations in selected urban/agricultural soils

Sample ID/locality

19/Valmez castle

20/backround

41/near coal tar refinery

54/Hostašovice

78/Vysoká

108/Poličná

109/Valmez confluence

116/on Štěpánov

137/Valmez Janáčkova

138/Krhová

PAHs

mg/kg dm

Naphthalene

0.230

0.230

0.180

0.220

0.200

0.180

0.210

0.210

0.440

0.500

Acenaphthylene

0.007

0.013

0.007

0.007

0.006

0.006

< 0.05

< 0.05

< 0.04

0.022

Acenaphthene

0.065

0.230

0.060

0.039

0.027

0.065

0.150

0.250

0.680

0.084

Fluorene

0.049

0.150

0.043

0.035

0.032

0.050

0.083

0.210

0.480

0.050

Phenanthrene

0.210

0.140

0.280

0.220

0.200

0.550

0.490

3.300

0.760

0.078

Anthracene

0.027

0.015

0.045

0.030

0.025

0.120

0.160

0.720

0.140

0.008

Fluoranthene

0.470

0.440

0.640

0.660

0.500

1.200

2.000

8.300

1.800

0.140

Pyrene

0.330

0.310

0.460

0.530

0.360

0.800

1.400

5.700

1.300

0.100

Benzo [a] anthracene

0.180

0.170

0.320

0.250

0.200

0.490

0.750

2.600

0.780

0.057

Chrysene

0.310

0.280

0.480

0.380

0.310

0.740

1.000

3.500

1.100

0.093

Benzo [b] fluoranthene

0.210

0.170

0.300

0.210

0.180

0.390

0.470

1.600

0.570

0.058

Benzo [k] fluoranthene

0.110

0.097

0.170

0.120

0.110

0.240

0.300

1.100

0.350

0.031

Benzo [a] pyrene

0.190

0.180

0.340

0.220

0.220

0.460

0.610

2.300

0.720

0.056

Dibenzo [a.h] anthracene

0.180

0.160

0.280

0.190

0.200

0.370

0.470

1.800

0.580

0.050

Benzo [ghi] perylene

0.041

0.039

0.081

0.049

0.047

0.096

0.130

0.450

0.150

0.012

Indeno [123-cd] pyrene

0.320

0.270

0.530

0.350

0.340

0.630

0.860

3.100

0.990

0.077

Σ 16 PAHs

2.929

2.894

4.216

3.510

2.957

6.387

9.083

35.140

10.840

1.416

Σ 7 carcinogenic PAHs

1.500

1.327

2.420

1.720

1.560

3.320

4.460

16.000

5.090

0.422

Table 6

Statistical evaluation of PAH concentrations in urban/agricultural soils

PAHs

Unit

Minimum

Maximum

Arithmetic mean

Standard deviation

Geometric mean

Median

Number of samples

Naphthalene

mg/kg dm

0.100

1.050

0.301

0.233

0.241

0.210

20

Acenaphthylene

mg/kg dm

0.003

0.022

0.009

0.005

0.008

0.007

20

Acenaphthene

mg/kg dm

0.020

0.680

0.114

0.145

0.073

0.064

20

Fluorene

mg/kg dm

0.020

0.480

0.084

0.101

0.059

0.050

20

Phenanthrene

mg/kg dm

0.054

3.300

0.411

0.685

0.234

0.215

20

Anthracene

mg/kg dm

0.008

0.720

0.082

0.152

0.039

0.039

20

Fluoranthene

mg/kg dm

0.120

8.300

1.073

1.730

0.603

0.625

20

Pyrene

mg/kg dm

0.087

5.700

0.754

1.187

0.431

0.435

20

Benzo [a] anthracene

mg/kg dm

0.054

2.600

0.398

0.542

0.246

0.245

20

Chrysene

mg/kg dm

0.079

3.500

0.565

0.725

0.364

0.355

20

Benzo [b] fluoranthene

mg/kg dm

0.053

1.600

0.293

0.327

0.205

0.210

20

Benzo [k] fluoranthene

mg/kg dm

0.029

1.100

0.183

0.226

0.122

0.115

20

Benzo [a] pyrene

mg/kg dm

0.056

2.300

0.366

0.475

0.236

0.220

20

Dibenzo [a.h] anthracene

mg/kg dm

0.050

1.800

0.296

0.370

0.197

0.195

20

Benzo [ghi] perylene

mg/kg dm

0.011

0.450

0.078

0.093

0.051

0.050

20

Indeno[123-cd)pyrene

mg/kg dm

0.077

3.100

0.523

0.636

0.347

0.345

20

Σ 16 PAHs

mg/kg dm

0.861

35.140

5.527

7.221

3.665

3.370

20

Σ 7 carcinogenic PAHs

mg/kg dm

0.400

16.000

2.625

3.299

1.720

1.640

20

Table 7

PAH concentration in A- and B- horizons of urban/agricultural and forest soil in the Valasske Mezirici Region

Sample ID/locality

Štěpánov (19) Agricultural soil A-horizon

Štěpánov (19) Agricultural soil B-horizon

Hodslavice (21) Forest soil A-horizon

Hodslavice (21)/Forest soil B-horizon

PAHs

mg/kg dm

Naphthalene

0.008

0.009

0.32

0.006

Acenaphthylene

0.004

0.007

< 0.10

0.003

Acenaphthene

0.009

< 0.008

0.25

0.011

Fluorene

< 0.020

< 0.016

0.12

< 0.020

Phenanthrene

0.11

0.093

1.3

0.02

Anthracene

0.015

0.009

0.13

0.002

Fluoranthene

0.26

0.25

3.2

0.044

Pyrene

0.19

0.18

2

0.031

Benzo [a] anthracene

0.099

0.088

0.97

0.013

Chrysene

0.17

0.15

2.2

0.034

Benzo [b] fluoranthene

0.13

0.092

1.8

0.037

Benzo [k] fluoranthene

0.061

0.049

0.78

0.012

Benzo [a] pyrene

0.12

0.093

1.1

0.015

Dibenzo [a.h] anthracene

0.085

0.055

1.1

0.016

Benzo [ghi] perylene

0.018

0.012

0.26

0.004

Indeno [123-cd] pyrene

0.17

0.11

1.9

0.029

Σ 16 PAHs

1.469

1.221

17.53

0.297

Σ 7 carcinogenic PAHs

0.835

0.637

9.850

0.156

cox (%)

3.82

1.78

17.85

4.58

cox content of organic oxidable carbon in soil samples (%)

The highest concentrations of the 16 selected PAHs were identified in the urban soils in the Valasske Mezirici town territory (ID 137, 109, 17, 18, 41, 11), and at the Jurinka (ID 6) and Policna (ID 108) sites. All of these sampling sites are situated south of the coal tar refinery and are in the proximity of the town center and the coal tar refinery. Influences from all PAH sources (industrial activity, local heating and transport) are evident. The remaining samples were collected north of the study area, and the identified PAH concentrations were lower in these sites. The sites (ID 13, 15, 20, 54, 78) are situated in the direction of the prevailing wind flow, and the landscape of this region decreases in altitude in this direction. The PAH atmospheric dispersion is greater in this direction, and a lower level of PAH deposition occurs at these sites.

Anomalous concentrations of the PAHs (35.16 mg/kg dm) and benzo [a]pyrene (2.25 mg/kg dm) were identified in the sample ID 116, in Stepanov. The values of the PAHs were significantly higher than in the other soil samples. This sample was collected in agricultural soil on the slope above the town in the southeast direction. It suggests that PAH deposition at higher altitudes in the proximity of PAH sources can occur as a consequence of unfavorable meteorological conditions associated with the low wind directions or calm conditions that are frequent in this region (see 2.1). These conditions are favorable for the occurrence of near ground high pollutant concentrations and are not appropriate for good atmospheric dispersion of pollutants [26]. Graphical presentations of the results are shown in Figures 4 and 5, illustrating the concentrations of the studied PAHs and benzo [a]pyrene in urban/agricultural as well as forest soils.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1467-4866-10-12/MediaObjects/12932_2009_Article_105_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

The PAH concentrations in urban/agricultural and forest soils in the Valasske Mezirici Region.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1467-4866-10-12/MediaObjects/12932_2009_Article_105_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

The benzo [a]pyrene concentrations in urban/agricultural and forest soils in the Valasske Mezirici Region.

The average PAH16 distribution pattern is shown in Table 8 and in Figure 6. Fluoranthene, pyrene, chrysene and indeno [1,2,3-cd]pyrene are the most prominent compounds in the samples (calculated from average values). The predominance of 4-6 ring compounds in the soil samples suggests pyrogenic sources [27]. However, higher concentrations of naphthalene were found in 12 samples (IDs 7,12,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,54,78,138). Six of these samples were collected in the coal tar refinery surroundings (IDs 7,13,15,16,54,78), four were collected in the town territory (IDs 12,17,18,19) in the proximity of the main routes, and one (ID 20) was from the background site. The proportion of naphthalene in the PAH samples was generally in the range of 6.2-22.3%, and in one case even 35.3% (ID 138).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1467-4866-10-12/MediaObjects/12932_2009_Article_105_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Comparison of PAH percentage distributions in urban/agricultural and forest soils in the Valasske Mezirici Region.

Table 8

The percentage distribution of each PAH compound in total PAH concentration

PAHs

Percentage (%)

PAHs

Percentage (%)

 

Urban/agricultural soil

Forest soil

 

Urban/agricultural soil

Forest soil

Naphthalene

0.60-16.20

0.38-1.95

Benzo [a] anthracene

5.81-8.30

5.29-8.06

Acenaphthylene

0.13-0.45

0.06-0.71

Chrysene

5.34-11.57

10.01-12.71

Acenaphthene

0.69-12.17

0.73-2.45

Benzo [b] fluoranthene

4.87-6.21

6.98-10.27

Fluorene

0.58-5.19

0.47-2.26

Benzo [k] fluoranthene

3.27-4.07

3.40-4.56

Phenanthrene

4.44-9.26

4.79-9.44

Benzo [a] pyrene

5.20-7.62

6.27-9.83

Anthracene

0.79-1.45

0.74-1.79

Benzo [ghi] perylene

4.11-6.67

4.72-6.67

Fluoranthene

12.30-22.14

14.40-22.65

Dibenzo [a,h] anthracene

1.10-1.59

1.11-1.83

Pyrene

8.72-16.30

9.48-13.86

Indeno [1,2,3-cd] pyrene

7.67-12.62

8.76-13.34

The presence of 2- and 3- ring PAHs can indicate more recent PAH deposition [27]. It is well known that light PAH compounds occur in soils in lower proportions than heavier ones, due to their physico-chemical properties, such as higher water solubility, volatility and biodegradability and lower sorption ability to soil organic matter or particles [28, 29]. Removal of the PAHs from the atmosphere is accomplished by dry or wet deposition of particles and vapors [30, 31]. Generally, it is known that for high level sources, the level of deposition near the source is small and increases with downwind distance from the source until it reaches a maximum, after which it decreases. For ground-level sources, the highest dry deposition is directly next to the source, and decreases downwind. Thus, it is possible to explain higher naphthalene contents in the soils in the territory of Valasske Mezirici due to naphthalene in PAH emissions from transport, local heating and the coal tar refinery.

Diagnostic ratios of selected PAH compounds are generally considered to be a good indicator of the pollution sources and of the mechanism of PAH transport into the soil. The ratios Ind/(Ind+BghiP) and Flt/(Flt+Pyr) are often used to distinguish between pyrogenic and petrogenic sources. The value of Ind/(Ind+BghiP) > 0.5 indicates grass/coal/wood combustion sources. The values of Flt/(Flt+Pyr) > 0.4 indicates pyrogenic sources, and we can distinguish between the values 0.4-0.5 for fuel combustion and > 0.5 for grass/coal/wood combustion sources. The ratio BaP/BghiP can also be used as an indicator for the determination of traffic and non-traffic sources, when the value > 0.6 is characteristic of traffic sources [2, 11]. The values of Ant/(Ant+Phe) < 0.1 and Baa/(Baa+Chry) < 0.2 correspond to petrogenic sources; values > 0.1 and >0.35, respectively, indicate pyrogenic sources. The values of the ratio Baa/(Baa+Chry) between 0.20-0.35 indicate mixed petrogenic and pyrogenic sources [32, 33].

In our data set, the values of Ind/(Ind+BghiP) range between 0.86-0.89, those of Flt/(Flt+Pyr) are in the range of 0.55-0.60 and those of BaP/BghiP are between 4.10-5.11. The values of Ind/(Ind+BghiP) and BaP/BghiP are significantly higher than those presented in Maliszewska-Kordybach et al. (2008), where the values are in the ranges of 0.45-0.7, 0.3-0.6 and 0.7-1.4, respectively [2]. The characteristic ratios indicate predominantly pyrogenic sources and coal/wood/grass combustion. The values of Ant/(Ant+Phe) are in the range of 0.09-0.2, and the Baa/(Baa+Chry) ratio ranges from 0.37-0.43. These ratio values confirmed that pyrogenic sources are the main pollution sources, even in the case of ID 116, where the highest PAH contents were determined. All these diagnostic ratios are illustrated in Figure 7 and in Table 9.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1467-4866-10-12/MediaObjects/12932_2009_Article_105_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

The comparison of molecular diagnostic ratios.

Table 9

Characteristic PAH molecular diagnostic ratios for urban/agricultural and forest soils in Valasske Mezirici Region compared with [50]

Molecular diagnostic ratio values

Diagnostic ratio

Urban/agricultural

Forest soil

Coal Tar [16]

Sources

Ant/(Ant + Phe)

0.09-0.25

0.10-0.20

0.22-0.27

pyrogenic (1 sample petrogenic)

Baa/(Baa + Chry)

0.37-0.43

0.29-0.39

0.48-0.58

pyrogenic > 0. 35. petrogenic < 0.2.;10 samples of forest soils

> 0.2 and < 0.35

Flt/(Flt + Pyr)

0.55-0.60

0.59-0.62

0.36-0.58

pyrogenic and coal/wood/grass combustion

Ind(Ind + BghiP)

0.86-0.89

0.85-0.90

0.38-0.59

pyrogenic and coal/wood/grass combustion

BaP/BghiP

4.10-5.11

4.07-6.39

1.67-3.25

traffic

The percentage of the sum of 8 PAHs compounds (with 4 or more aromatic rings, excluding fluoranthene and pyrene) and the sum of naphthalene and phenanthrene concentrations from the full set of PAHs are alternative ways to determine the pollution source [34]. The percentages of the naphthalene and phenanthrene sum from the PAHs under investigation were in the range 9-28.3%, except in one case (sample ID 138), where the value was 40%. The contribution of compounds with 4 or more aromatic rings was in the range of 41-59%. These values are in accordance with the data presented in Wilcke et al. (2007a), where soil evaluations were performed in Switzerland, Germany, Spain, Korea and China, and combustion and long range transport were identified as the main pollution sources in this study.

The Czech Republic requires the regular monitoring of agricultural soils [35]. The PAHs level ranged from 0.056 to 9.489 mg/kg dm for PAHs (16 except acenaphthylene) and < 0.004-0.624 mg/kg dm for benzo [a]pyrene, with annual arithmetic means ranging from 0.797-1.297 mg/kg dm for PAHs (16 except for acenaphthylene) and from 0.059-0.119 mg/kg dm for benzo [a]pyrene. The annual median values were in the range of 0.534-0.967 mg/kg dm for PAHs and 0.047-0.089 mg/kg dm for benzo [a]pyrene. The comparison of the arithmetic mean and median values with those identified in the agricultural and urban soils in Valasske Mezirici confirm a higher load of the PAHs pollution in the Valasske Mezirici Region.

These values were compared to the data reported in Maliszewska-Kordybach et al. (2008) for the top layer of soils from non-industrial areas in Europe. Our minimum values are significantly higher than the reported data set, but the maximum values (except the sample ID 116) are comparable with those in Norway (0.009-11.000 mg/kg dm), in the UK (0.042-11.200 mg/kg dm), and in Poland (0.075-11.391 mg/kg dm) [2].

3.2 PAHs in forest soils

Two processes affect the fate of PAHs in forest soils: deposition and decomposition. In addition to the PAHs input to the soil through litter, dry and wet deposition of aerosol particles is an important pathway of path contamination of acid forest soils. The highest PAH concentrations in the air were in aerosol particles of grain size of 0.1-3 μm[36]. PAHs may be degraded in forest soils/forest humus, although microbial degradation activity decreases at pH levels below 3.6 [37, 38]. The scavenging effect is a key source of forest soil contamination, and the high amount of natural organic matter in forest soil also provides better conditions for the binding and accumulation of PAHs in soils [8, 29, 39]. Coniferous trees with needles are more efficient at collecting particles and cloud droplets than leafy trees [30].

The observed PAH concentrations in forest soils are summarized in Tables 10, 11 and the statistical evaluation is in Table 12. The PAH concentrations varied from 7.657-79.385 mg/kg dm, with arithmetic mean 25.51 mg/kg dm and median 18.21 mg/kg dm. The benzo [a]pyrene concentrations were in the range of 0.53-6.20 mg/kg dm, with arithmetic mean 1.85 and median 1.30 mg/kg dm. The results of the analysis of A- and B-horizons for forest soil sample are shown in Table 7. The PAH content of the B-horizon are higher than those corresponding to typical forest soils (0.005-0.100 mg/kg), which showed a higher pollution load in the forest soils in the region [25]. All the analyzed PAHs were identified in each soil sample, except acenaphthylene, which was below the detection limit in most samples.
Table 10

PAH concentrations in selected forest soils

Sample ID/locality

1/Nad Lipuvkou

2/Haj

3/Choryne

4/Branky-Kladeruby

5/Branky-Studanky

6/Zavadilka

7/Policna

8/Lhota u Choryne

9/Jurinka

10/Bynina

PAHs

mg/kg dm

Naphthalene

0.360

0.250

0.180

0.120

0.096

0.110

0.190

0.150

0.350

0.350

Acenaphthylene

<0.07

<0.08

0.038

<0.04

<0.08

<0.06

<0.09

<0.03

<0.07

<0.05

Acenaphthene

0.640

0.244

0.150

0.330

0.140

0.190

0.150

0.110

0.450

0.220

Fluorene

0.670

0.160

0.120

0.210

0.084

0.100

0.110

0.081

0.280

0.170

Phenanthrene

2.700

1.800

1.000

1.400

0.950

0.730

1.300

0.570

2.100

2.000

Anthracene

0.500

0.250

0.120

0.150

0.120

0.150

0.170

0.076

0.510

0.280

Fluoranthene

5.700

4.000

2.200

3.400

2.100

1.900

3.100

1.400

4.100

4.800

Pyrene

4.000

2.700

1.400

2.300

1.300

1.200

1.900

0.900

2.700

3.100

Benzo[a] anthracene

1.900

1.300

0.690

1.000

0.650

0.720

1.000

0.450

2.100

1.600

Chrysene

3.500

2.600

1.400

1.900

1.300

1.200

2.000

0.960

3.300

3.100

Benzo[b] fluoranthene

2.300

2.000

0.990

1.300

1.100

0.880

1.400

0.710

2.200

2.300

Benzo[k] fluoranthene

1.100

0.950

0.490

0.640

0.480

0.440

0.690

0.320

1.300

1.100

Benzo[a] pyrene

1.900

1.500

0.840

1.100

0.800

0.860

1.100

0.530

2.800

1.700

Dibenzo[a.h] anthracene

1.400

1.300

0.710

0.900

0.670

0.640

1.000

0.460

1.900

1.400

Benzo[ghi] perylene

0.330

0.310

0.170

0.230

0.160

0.140

0.230

0.110

0.520

0.340

Indeno[123-cd ] pyrene

2.600

2.300

1.300

1.600

1.300

1.200

1.900

0.830

3.800

2.600

Σ 16 PAHs

29.600

21.664

11.798

16.580

11.250

10.460

16.240

7.657

28.410

25.060

Σ 7 carcinogenic PAHs

14.700

11.950

6.420

8.440

6.300

5.940

9.090

4.260

17.400

13.800

Cox (%)

15.600

18.010

13.890

11.050

19.200

10.250

12.900

10.310

8.880

16.450

Cox content of organic oxidizable carbon in soil samples (%)

Table 11

PAH concentrations in selected forest soils

Sample ID/locality

11/Priluky

12/Doubrava

13/Podlesi

14/Velka Lhota

15/Dusna

16/Ruzdka

17/Mikuluvka

18/Oznice

20/Krhova-Jehlicna

PAHs

mg/kg dm

Naphthalene

0.190

0.110

0.360

0.290

0.200

0.110

0.100

0.120

0.160

Acenaphthylene

<0.03

<0.04

0.055

0.043

0.043

<0.07

0.023

0.049

0.032

Acenaphthene

0.300

0.190

0.580

1.200

1.300

0.190

0.310

0.180

0.360

Fluorene

0.210

0.088

0.370

1.000

1.000

0.086

0.170

0.170

0.220

Phenanthrene

1.400

0.660

3.800

6.900

5.000

0.950

1.100

1.700

2.400

Anthracene

0.260

0.076

0.830

1.000

0.700

0.130

0.160

0.240

0.320

Fluoranthene

2.800

1.700

17.000

15.000

12.000

2.600

3.100

4.400

5.700

Pyrene

2.000

1.100

11.000

10.000

7.400

1.800

2.100

2.700

3.800

Benzo[a] anthracene

1.200

0.500

6.400

5.000

3.300

0.910

1.000

1.400

1.800

Chrysene

2.100

1.200

10.000

8.500

5.300

1.700

1.800

2.700

3.500

Benzo[b] fluoranthene

1.600

0.940

6.000

5.400

3.700

1.300

1.300

2.000

2.600

Benzo[k] fluoranthene

0.780

0.400

3.200

2.700

1.800

0.600

0.610

0.960

1.200

Benzo[a] pyrene

1.600

0.640

6.200

5.300

3.400

1.000

1.100

1.500

2.100

Dibenzo[a.h] anthracene

1.100

0.570

4.500

3.600

2.500

0.820

0.880

1.300

1.600

Benzo[ghi] perylene

0.270

0.130

0.990

0.830

0.630

0.190

0.270

0.340

0.370

Indeno[123-cd] pyrene

2.200

1.100

8.100

6.600

4.700

1.500

1.500

2.500

3.000

Σ 16 PAHs

18.010

9.404

79.385

73.363

52.973

13.886

15.523

22.259

29.162

Σ 7 carcinogenic PAHs

10.580

5.350

44.400

37.100

24.700

7.830

8.190

12.360

15.800

cox (%)

10.59

10.31

3.45

3.54

7.21

15.78

14.27

18.91

16.47

Cox content of organic oxidizable carbon in soil samples (%)

Table 12

Statistical evaluation of PAH concentrations in forest soils

PAHs

Unit

Minimum

Maximum

Arithmetic mean

Standard deviation

Geometric mean

Median

Number of samples

Naphthalene

mg/kg dm

0.100

0.360

0.210

0.100

0.180

0.190

20

Acenaphthylene

mg/kg dm

LD*

0.100

0.020

0.020

0.040

0.040

20

Acenaphthene

mg/kg dm

0.110

1.300

0.370

0.320

0.290

0.250

20

Fluorene

mg/kg dm

0.080

1.000

0.270

0.280

0.190

0.170

20

Phenanthrene

mg/kg dm

0.570

6.900

1.990

1.550

1.580

1.400

20

Anthracene

mg/kg dm

0.080

1.000

0.310

0.260

0.230

0.210

20

Fluoranthene

mg/kg dm

1.400

17.000

5.010

4.300

3.860

3.300

20

Pyrene

mg/kg dm

0.900

11.000

3.270

2.790

2.520

2.200

20

Benzo[a] anthracene

mg/kg dm

0.450

6.400

1.690

1.500

1.290

1.100

20

Chrysene

mg/kg dm

0.960

10.000

3.010

2.330

2.430

2.150

20

Benzo[b] fluoranthene

mg/kg dm

0.710

6.000

2.090

1.390

1.760

1.700

20

Benzo[k] fluoranthene

mg/kg dm

0.320

3.200

1.030

0.740

0.850

0.780

20

Benzo[a] pyrene

mg/kg dm

0.530

6.200

1.850

1.480

1.470

1.300

20

Dibenzo[a.h] anthracene

mg/kg dm

0.460

4.500

1.420

1.010

1.180

1.100

20

Benzo[ghi] perylene

mg/kg dm

0.110

0.990

0.340

0.230

0.280

0.270

20

Indeno[123-cd)pyrene

mg/kg dm

0.830

8.100

2.630

1.840

2.180

2.050

20

Σ 16 PAHs

mg/kg dm

7.660

79.390

25.510

19.660

20.470

18.210

20

Σ 7 carcinogenic PAHs

mg/kg dm

4.260

44.400

13.927

10.474

11.261

10.580

20

LD - limit of detection

Generally, high levels of the 16 investigated PAHs were identified in the transect zone of the north-south direction. The highest concentrations of the PAHs, as well as of benzo [a]pyrene and the other single PAH compounds, were detected southeast of the coal tar refinery and the town (IDs 13,14,15). The lowest concentrations were identified to the west of the town (IDs 7,12). These findings correspond to the meteorological conditions in the region, with the frequent south and north wind directions, inversion situations and the east wind direction being the least frequent.

The distribution of pollutants in the environment is influenced by landscape relief. This aspect is apparent in this region, due to the meteorological conditions low wind velocities and calm are the two most frequent wind flow situations. The altitude increases to the south and east from the town of Valasske Mezirici. In the north, the altitude decreases, and atmospheric pollutants can be better dispersed by the south wind (Figure 1). However, the PAH dispersion during frequent calm and inversion situations is very slow and is associated with pollutant concentrations increasing near the ground. These meteorological conditions are mainly correlated with low temperatures, and the PAHs are deposited on the slopes of the hills surrounding the town of Valasske Mezirici.

The PAH concentration trend shows that the highest concentrations are obtained at higher altitudes in the proximity of the town (Figure 4 and 8). In the case of the altitude of 400 m above sea level, the PAH concentrations decrease with increased distance from the town centre; this is in agreement with other authors [39]. The three last values in Figure 8 show the PAHs and benzo [a]pyrene concentrations at the highest altitudes of 450, 625 and 670 m, to the southeast of the town (IDs 13,14, respectively 15). The site with the altitude of 450 m is the nearest to the town of these three points, which is the reason for the highest PAH value there.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1467-4866-10-12/MediaObjects/12932_2009_Article_105_Fig8_HTML.jpg
Figure 8

The total PAH concentration as a function of altitude.

For two sites at higher altitudes (500 and 550 m above sea level), the PAH and benzo [a]pyrene concentrations were not as high as in the preceding three sites. Policna (ID 7, 500 m above sea level) is located to the west of the town, outside the frequent wind flow, and the site Ruzdka (ID 16, 550 m above sea level) is the furthest from the town. It is situated to the south and is sheltered from pollutant deposition by higher hill barriers (481-691 m above sea level) between the site and the town PAH sources. The levels of PAHs and benzo [a]pyrene at the altitudes of 450, 625 and 670 m markedly exceeded other values.

Comparing the distributions of single PAHs compounds with altitude, we found that all the compounds had the same trend, except fluorene, acenaphthene and phenanthrene, where some deviations appeared. Fluorene, acenaphthene and anthracene are the least abundant in forest soil. The behavior of lower molecular PAHs is affected by the collecting effect of the bark. Due to their physico-chemical characteristics, lower molecular PAHs are more efficiently adsorbed by the bark, they are leached from the organic layers, they can be re-volatilized or biodegraded, and so on [40]. The sum of the 7 carcinogenic PAHs (according to IARC, see 3.1) in the selected forest soil ranged from 4.260-44.400 mg/kg dm, and they formed 47-61% of the sum of the 16 PAHs. The average PAH distribution pattern for forest soils is shown in Table 8 and in Figure 6. Fluoranthene, pyrene, chrysene, indeno [1,2,3-cd]pyrene and the sum of benzo [b,k]fluoranthenes are the most prominent compounds in the samples (calculated from average values) as in the urban/agricultural soil data set. The contribution of naphthalene to the sum of the 16 PAHs (0.38-1.95%) is lower than in urban/agricultural soil.

The diagnostic ratios Ind/(Ind+BghiP) and Flt/(Flt+Pyr) were also used to distinguish possible sources of high concentrations of PAHs in forest soils. The values of Ind/(Ind+BghiP), Flt/(Flt+Pyr), BaP/BghiP, Ant/(Ant+Phe) and Baa/(Baa+Chry) ranged from 0.85-0.90; 0.58-0.62; 4.07-6.39; 0.10-0.20; 0.29-0.39, respectively. These values are close to those calculated in the urban/agricultural soils in our study (Figure 7). The dominant pollution sources according to these values are pyrogenic sources, coal/wood/grass combustion, and the ratio of BaP/BghiP confirms a contribution from traffic. We can observe some differences in the Baa/(Baa+Chry) ratio, whose values are lower than 0.35, corresponding to a mixture of pyrogenic and petrogenic sources in the 10 samples of forest soils. Only pyrogenic sources are found in urban/agricultural soils using this molecular ratio. Most of the forest soil samples had a higher value of Ind/(Ind+BghiP) than the urban/agricultural soils (Figure 7).

The percentage of the sum of 8 PAH compounds (4-6) and of the sum of naphthalene and phenanthrene concentrations in the complete PAH set were in the ranges 48-63% and 5-10%, respectively. In case of the naphthalene and phenanthrene sum, we see a lower proportion in the sum of the 16 PAHs than in the case of urban/agricultural soil, whereas the proportion of the 8-PAH sum is slightly higher.

3.3 Comparison of the PAHs in soils from other geographic locations

The PAH concentrations in the forest soils in the Valasske Mezirici Region are much higher than the concentrations presented in [10, 27, 29, 41]. PAH concentrations were significantly higher at upper than at lower slope sites, indicating long-distance transport [40]. The comparison of PAH concentrations in forest soils of different regions in Europe with area of Valasske Mezirici is summarized in Table 13. The PAHs concentrations presented in this paper correspond to those identified in forest soils in regions with elevated atmospheric PAH deposition: in Northern Bavaria (0.644-19.919 mg/kg dm in A-horizon) and near a blast furnace plant located in the region of Hoogovens, in the Netherlands [39, 42]. The PAH levels in urban/agricultural soils are in accordance with those in industrialized areas [11, 32, 4345]. In total, the PAH concentrations in forest soils were significantly greater than those identified in urban/agricultural soils.
Table 13

The PAHs values in various types soils in various regions

Region

Soil type

PAHs

Contents (mg/kg dm)

Literature

Norway

forest soils

Σ16 PAHs

< 006.2 - 010.0

Jensen et al., 2007,[27]

  

Σ15 PAHs, except

  

Austria

forest soils

Naphthalene

0.068 - 1.342

Weiss et al., 2000,[29]

UK

woodland soils

Σ15 PAHs

up to 4.850

Nam et al., 2008,[10]

Switzerland

forest soils

Σ16 PAHs

0.098 0.219

Bucheli et al., 2004,[41]

Czech republic

forest soils

Σ16 PAHs

2.000-30.000

Wilcke et al., 2007b,[40]

Northern Bavaria, Germany

forest soils

Σ16 PAHs

0.644 19.919

Krauss et al., 2000,[42]

Valasske Mezirici

forest soils

Σ16 PAHs

7.657 - 79.385

Placha et al

Belgium

industrial soil

Σ16 PAHs

2.00 - 300.000

Bakker et al., 2000,[43]

Germany

river bank soils

Σ16 PAHs

12.200 - 31.200

Pies et al., 2008,[32]

Beijing, China

urban soil

Σ16 PAHs

0.220 - 27.830

Tang et al., 2005,[44]

Nanjing, China

urban soil

Σ16 PAHs

0.290 - 17.640

Yin et al., 2008,[11]

Nanjing, China

residential areas

Σ16 PAHs

0.460 - 3.110

Yin et al., 2008,[11]

Nanjing, China

agricultural soil

Σ16 PAHs

0.310 - 27.580

Yin et al., 2008,[11]

Spain

urban soil

Σ16 PAHs

0.340 - 6.060

Nadal et al., 2007,[45]

Valasske Mezirici

urban/agricultural soil

Σ16 PAHs

0.861-10.840 (one anomalous value 35.140)

Placha et al

In their studies, Farrar et al. (2005) and Tao et al. (2007) observed clear decreasing trends in PAH concentrations in the vertical distribution in the urban boundary atmospheric layer. There are three possible scenarios of the vertical concentration profiles due to differences in emission sources, advection and vertical mixing conditions: 1) even vertical mixing, with weak fresh emissions, dominant advection and well-mixing conditions, 2) decrease with height, with ground source domination and stable atmospheric boundary layer conditions, 3) increase with height with upper boundary layer emission sources [46, 47]. We can suppose, especially in the winter and autumn periods that Scenario 2 predominates in the studied area, when pyrogenic sources and traffic are the dominant pollution sources according to the determined values of molecular diagnostic ratios (see 3.1 and 3.2). Local heating and traffic are sources that emit pollutants at ground level. However, an important source of PAH pollution is located in this region the coal tar refinery. During coal tar treatment, some operations are performed (for example coal tar launching) that lead to organic compound escape to the ambient air. The escape level depends on the air temperature. The possible emissions sources in coal tar refinery are 15 m of height and they can contribute to the pollution sources at ground level not only in the winter days, but also in periods with higher temperatures.

A higher level of deposition of PAH compounds on the hill slopes in the vicinity of the town occurs in this region as a consequence of the prevailing meteorological conditions (on average, 66% of meteorological situations are calm with wind velocities 0-2.5 m/s, 27.5% have wind velocity 2.6-7.5 m/s and 6.5% have wind velocities >7.6 m/s, according to the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute) and topographical terrain. The meteorological conditions are not favorable for atmospheric pollutant dispersion, and the pollutants are accumulated in the boundary layer, the altitude of the inversion layer generally reaches a number of tens or hundreds meters) [26]. The unfavorable meteorological conditions usually persist for several days and are repeated (see 3.1).

The molecular diagnostic ratios indicate pyrogenic sources and combustion of coal, wood and grass as main pollution sources. However, the coal tar composition is formed especially from naphthalene (10% by weight), phenanthrene (4.5% by weight), fluoranthene (3.0% by weight), acenaphthylene (2.5% by weight), pyrene (2.0% by weight), fluorene (1.8% by weight), anthracene (1.3% by weight), chrysene (1.0% by weight) and acenaphthene (0.2% by weight) [48]. This fact can explain the higher concentrations of lighter PAHs, especially naphthalene, in urban/agricultural soils in the vicinity of the refinery and their higher contributions to the sum of the 16 PAHs in the urban/agricultural soils compared to the forest soils (Table 8, Figure 6). The diagnostic ratios determined for coal tar are 0.18 for Ant/(Ant+Phe), 0.58 for Flt/(Flt+Pyr), 0.54 for Baa/(Baa+Chry) and 0.53 for Ind/(Ind+BghiP) [49]. Thus, these values correspond to those in our samples in the case of Ant/(Ant+Phe) and Flt/(Flt+Pyr). The values of Baa/(Baa+Chry) were lower, and those of Ind/(Ind+BghiP) were higher in our samples. All the values correspond to coal/wood/grass combustion and pyrogenic sources. Brown et al. (2006) compared eleven samples of coal tars from 10 former manufactured gas plant sites in the Eastern United States [16]. The diagnostic ratios determined in these coal tar samples were within the ranges (Table 9): 0,22-0,27 for Ant/(Ant+Phe), 0,36-0,58 for Flt/(Flt+Pyr), 0,48-0,58 for Baa/(Baa+Chry), 0,38-0,59 for Ind/(Ind+BghiP) and 1,67-3,25 for BaP/BghiP. Thus, these values correspond to those in our samples in case of Ant/(Ant+Phe) and Flt/(Flt+Pyr). It is not possible to distinguish between pyrogenic sources and the coal tar refinery in this way, because the ratios presented are determined for cruel coal tar, but the coal tar refinery may contribute to soil by emitted PAH deposition. The diagnostic ratios in depositions can be completely different.

We observed in our samples higher concentrations of indeno [1,2,3-cd]pyrene compared to benzo [ghi]perylene. Yunker et al. (2002) listed in his work typical ratios for petroleum, single source combustion and environmental samples; the Ind/(Ind+BghiP) values were in the range of 0.09-0.70, while we determined these values to be above 0.85 in our samples, and higher in forest soils than in urban soils [49]. Indeno [1,2,3-cd]pyrene and benzo [ghi]perylene are degraded photochemically at comparable rates, and the original composition is preserved during atmospheric transport. The concentrations of benzo [a]pyrene were also significantly higher than those of benzo [ghi]perylene (4-6 times higher), and the ratio values were higher in forest soils than urban/agricultural ones. An inverse trend was observed in the case of Baa/(Baa+Chry), where mixed sources (pyrogenic and petrogenic) were determined in most of forest soils, and pyrogenic sources in the urban soils. Because we did not suppose petroleum sources in forest soils (the samples were collected in remote areas) this fact may correspond to faster benzo [a]anthracene degradation in forest soils or in the air during the atmospheric transport.

4. Conclusions

The urban, agricultural and forest soils in the region of Valasske Mezirici are contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are emitted through industrial processes, transport and local heating sources. The highest PAH concentrations were found in forest soils from the forest-covered slopes of hills. The observed values were much higher than the PAH concentrations reported for forest soils in Western and Northern Europe. The PAH concentrations in the urban soils were higher than in the agricultural soils, but comparable with other soils from urban areas in the world. The highest PAH concentrations were observed in forest soils collected at higher altitudes above sea level. The PAH distribution in the mountainous region is related to altitude and influenced by meteorological conditions. The frequent calm conditions that are connected with inversion conditions contribute to PAH deposition at higher altitudes in the surroundings of the town. Elevated PAH concentrations were identified at sites further from the town, but the concentrations decreased in comparison with sites in the proximity of the town. Compared to the PAH load in other world areas, it is clearly confirmed that the soils in the region of Valasske Mezirici, especially the forest soils, are highly polluted. There is a primary source of PAH pollution in the region a coal tar refinery. There are also contributions from other sources local heating, vehicle transport and long range pollutant transport. It is not possible to distinguish the contributions of each source on the basis of diagnostic ratios.

Abbreviations

PAHs: 

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Ace: 

Acenaphthene

Acy: 

Acenaphthylene

Ant: 

Anthracene

Baa: 

Benzo [a]anthracene

Bap: 

Benzo [a]pyrene

Bbf: 

Benzo [b]fluoranthene

Bkf: 

Benzo [k]fluoranthene

BghiP: 

Benzo [g.h.i]perylene; Chry Chrysene

Daa: 

Dibenzo [ah]anthracene

Flt: 

Fluoranthene

Flu: 

Fluorene

Ind: 

Indeno [1,2,3-cd]pyrene

Nap: 

Naphthalene

Phe: 

Phenanthrene

Pyr: 

Pyrene

Dm: 

dry matter.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support of the research project INTERVIRON 2BE6068 (The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, the Czech Republic).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre of Nanotechnology, VSB - Technical University of Ostrava
(2)
Institute of Geological Engineering, VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, the Faculty of Mining and Geology
(3)
Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research Dresden, IFW Dresden

References

  1. Liu X, Zhang G, Jones KC, Li X, Peng X, Qi S: Compositional fractionation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in mosses (Hypnum plumaeformae WILS.) from the northern slope of Nanling Mountains, South China. Atmospheric Environment. 2005, 39: 5490-5499. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.05.048.View Article
  2. Maliszewska-Kordybach B, Smreczak B, Klimkowicz-Pawlas A, Terelak H: Monitoring of the total content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in arable soils in Poland. Chemosphere. 2008, 73: 1284-1291. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.07.009.View Article
  3. Vila-Escalé M, Vegas-Vilarrúbia T, Prat N: Release of polycyclic aromatic compounds into a Mediterranean creek (Catalonia, NE Spain) after a forest fire. Water Research. 2007, 41: 2171-2179. 10.1016/j.watres.2006.07.029.View Article
  4. Wang Z, Chen J, Qiao X, Yang P, Tian F, Juany L: Distribution and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from urban to rural soils: A case study in Dalian, China. Chemosphere. 2007, 68: 965-971. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.017.View Article
  5. Holoubek I, Vokounová Š, Kompres J: Persistentní organické polutanty v atmosféře a půdách, těkání z půd. Ochrana ovzduší. 2000, 3: 4-19.
  6. Kim EJ, Oh JE, Chány YS: Effects of forest fire on the level and distribution of PCDD/Fs and PAHs in soil. The Science of The Total Environment. 2003, 311: 177-189. 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00095-0.View Article
  7. Omar NYMJ, Bin Abas MR, Ketuly KA, Tahir NM: Concentrations of PAHs in atmospheric particles (PM-10) and roadside soil particles collected in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Atmospheric Environment. 2002, 36: 247-254. 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00425-3.View Article
  8. Wong F, Harnerb T, Liua QT, Diamonda ML: Using experimental and forest soils to investigate the uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) along an urban-rural gradient. Environmental Pollution. 2004, 129: 387-398. 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.12.006.View Article
  9. Chung MK, Hu R, Cheung KC, Wong MH: Pollutants in Hong Kong soils: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chemosphere. 2007, 67: 464-470. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.062.View Article
  10. Nam JJ, Thomas GO, Jaward FM, Steinnes E, Gustafsson O, Jones KC: PAHs in background soils from Western Europe: Influence of atmospheric deposition and soil organic matter. Chemospher. 2008, 70: 1596-1602. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.08.010.View Article
  11. Yin ChQ, Jiang X, Yang XL, Bian YR, Wang F: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils in the vicinity of Nanjing, China. Chemosphere. 2008, 73: 389-394. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.05.041.View Article
  12. Town of Valasske Mezirici. Profile of the town. [http://www.valasskemezirici.cz/en/1928/]
  13. Benhabib K, Faure P, Sardin M, Simonnot MO: Characteristics of a solid coal tar sampled from a contaminated soil and of the organics transferred into water. Fuel. 2009, doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2009.06.009
  14. Brown DG, Gupta L, Kim TH, Moo-Young HK, Coleman AJ: Comparative assessment of coal tars obtained from 10 former manufactured gas plant sites in the Eastern United States. Chemosphere. 2006, 65: 1562-1569. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.068.View Article
  15. DEZA, member of Agrofert Group. [http://www.deza.cz/]
  16. Integrovaný registr znečiš'ování životního prostředí (IRZ). [http://www.irz.cz/]
  17. Scheyer JM, Hipple KW: Urban Soil Primer. 2005, United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, Nebraska, [http://soils.usda.gov/use]
  18. Lehmann A, Stahr K: Nature and Significance of Anthropogenic Urban Soils. J Soils Sediments. 2007, 7: 247-260. 10.1065/jss2007.06.235.View Article
  19. Tan Kim H: Soil sampling, preparation and analysis. 2005, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, Florida, 623-
  20. ISO 10381-4:2003 Soil quality - Sampling - Part 4: Guidance on the procedure for investigation of natural, near-natural and cultivated sites.
  21. ISO 10381-5:2005 Soil quality - Sampling - Part 5: Guidance on the procedure for the investigation of urban and industrial sites with regard to soil contamination.
  22. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use: Validation of analytical procedures: definitions and terminology. Geneva. 1996
  23. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4, Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. QUAM. 2000, Second
  24. De Vos B, Lettens S, Muys B, Deckers JA: Walkley-Black analysis of forest soil organic carbon: recovery, limitations and uncertainty. Soil Use and Management. 2007, 23: 221-229. 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2007.00084.x.View Article
  25. Air Quality Guidelines. 2000, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark, Second
  26. Dordevič DS, Šolevič TM: The contributions of high- and low altitude emission sources to the near ground concentrations of air pollutants. Atmospheric Research. 2008, 87: 170-182. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.08.005.View Article
  27. Jensen H, Reimann C, Finne TE, Ottesen RT, Arnoldussen A: PAH-concentrations and compositions in the top 2 cm of forest soils along a 120 km long transect through agricultural areas, forests and the city of Oslo, Norway. Environmental Pollution. 2007, 14: 829-838. 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.05.008.View Article
  28. PAHs: An Ecotoxicological Perspective. Edited by: Peter ET Douben. 2003, 404-
  29. Weiss P, Lorbeer G, Scharf S: Regional aspects and statistical characterisation of the load with semivolatile organic compounds at remote Austrian forest sites. Chemosphere. 2000, 40: 1159-1171. 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00365-3.View Article
  30. Erisman JW, Draaijers G: Deposition to forest in Europe: most important factors influencing dry deposition and models used for generalization. Environmental Pollution. 2003, 124: 379-388. 10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00049-6.View Article
  31. Ravindra K, Sokhi R, Van Grieken R: Atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source attribution, emission factors and regulation. Atmospheric Environment. 2008, 42: 2895-2921. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.010.View Article
  32. Pies C, Hoffmann B, Petrowsky J, Yang Y, Ternes TA, Hofmann T: Characterization and source identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in river bank soils. Chemosphere. 2008, 72: 1594-1601. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.021.View Article
  33. Zhang HB, Luo YM, Wong MH, Zhao QG, Zhang GL: Distributions and Concentrations of PAHs in Hong Kong Soils. Environmental Pollution. 2006, 141: 107-114. 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.08.031.View Article
  34. Wilcke W, Zech W: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in forest floors of the Northern Czech Mountains. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde. 2007, 160: 573-579. 10.1002/jpln.19971600508.View Article
  35. Prášková L, Kubík L, Křivánek J, Majer F, Malý S: Kontrola a monitoring cizorodých látek v zemědělské půdě a vstupech do půdy. Zpráva za rok 2006. 2007, Central Institute for supervising and Testing in Agriculture, Brno
  36. Schönbuchner H, Guggenberger G, Peters K, Bergmann H, Zech W: Particle size distribution of PAH in the air of a remote norway spruce forest in northern Bavaria. Water, Air and Soil Pollution. 2001, 128: 355-367. 10.1023/A:1010388125548.View Article
  37. Koivula TT, Salkinoja-Salonen M, Peltola R, Romantschuk M: Pyrene degradation in forest humus microcosms with or without pine and its mycorrhizal fungus. Environ Qual. 2004, 33: 45-53. 10.2134/jeq2004.0045.View Article
  38. West AW, Sparling GP, Feltham CW, Reynolds J: Microbial activity and survival in soils dried at different rates. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 1992, 30: 209-222. 10.1071/SR9920209.View Article
  39. Van Brummelen TC, Verweij RA, Wedzinga SA, Van Gestel CAM: Enrichment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in forest soils near blast furnace plant. Chemosphere. 1996, 32: 293-314. 10.1016/0045-6535(95)00339-8.View Article
  40. Wilcke W: Global patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil. Geoderma. 2007, 141: 157-166. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.007.View Article
  41. Bucheli TD, Blum F, Desaules A, Gustafsson O: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, black carbon, and molecular markers in soils of Switzerland. Chemosphere. 2004, 11: 1061-1076. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.06.002.View Article
  42. Krauss M, Wilcke W, Zech W: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls in forest soils: depth distribution as indicator of different fate. Environmental Pollution. 2000, 110: 79-88. 10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00280-8.View Article
  43. Bakker MI, Casado B, Koerselman JW, Tolls J, Kollöffel C: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil and plant samples from the vicinity of an oil refinery. The Science of The Total Environment. 2000, 263: 91-100. 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00669-0.View Article
  44. Tang L, Tang XY, Zhu YG, Zheng MH, Miao QL: Contamination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban soils in Beijing, China. Environment International. 2005, 31: 822-828. 10.1016/j.envint.2005.05.031.View Article
  45. Nadal M, Schuhmacher M, Domino JL: Levels of metals, PCBs, PCNs and PAHs in soils of a highly industrialized chemical/petrochemical area: Temporal trend. Chemosphere. 2007, 66: 267-276. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.020.View Article
  46. Farrar NJ, Harner T, Shoeib M, Sweetman A, Jones KC: Field deployment of thin film passive air samplers for persistent organic pollutants: a study in the urban atmospheric boundary layer. Environmental Science and Technology. 2005, 39: 28-42.
  47. Tao S, Wang Y, Wu S, Liu S, Dou H, Liu Y, Chang L, Hu F, Xing B: Vertical distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric boundary layer of Beijing in winter. Atmospheric Environment. 2007, 41: 9594-9602. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.026.View Article
  48. Vymětal J, Plesnik M: Zpracování černouhelného dehtu a smoly. DEZA Valasske Mezirici. 1994, 34-44.
  49. Yunker MB, Macdonald RW, Vingarzan R, Mitchell RH, Goyette D, Sylvestre S: PAHs in the Fraser River basin: a critical appraisal of PAH ratios as indicators of PAH source and composition. Organic Geochemistry. 2002, 33: 489-515. 10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00002-5.View Article
  50. Katsoyiannis A, Terzi E, Cai QY: On the use of PAH molecular diagnostic ratios in sewage sludge for the understanding of the PAH sources. Is this use appropriate?. Chemosphere. 2007, 69: 1337-1339. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.05.084.View Article

Copyright

© Plachá et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.