Open Access

A 50-year record of NOx and SO2 sources in precipitation in the Northern Rocky Mountains, USA

Geochemical Transactions201112:4

DOI: 10.1186/1467-4866-12-4

Received: 8 January 2010

Accepted: 7 March 2011

Published: 7 March 2011


Ice-core samples from Upper Fremont Glacier (UFG), Wyoming, were used as proxy records for the chemical composition of atmospheric deposition. Results of analysis of the ice-core samples for stable isotopes of nitrogen (δ15N, ) and sulfur (δ34S, ), as well as and deposition rates from the late-1940s thru the early-1990s, were used to enhance and extend existing National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network (NADP/NTN) data in western Wyoming. The most enriched δ34S value in the UFG ice-core samples coincided with snow deposited during the 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens, Washington. The remaining δ34S values were similar to the isotopic composition of coal from southern Wyoming. The δ15N values in ice-core samples representing a similar period of snow deposition were negative, ranging from -5.9 to -3.2 ‰ and all fall within the δ15N values expected from vehicle emissions. Ice-core nitrate and sulfate deposition data reflect the sharply increasing U.S. emissions data from 1950 to the mid-1970s.


The chemical quality of snowfall deposited in high-elevation areas in the Rocky Mountain region can be affected by energy generation and associated population growth [1, 2]. High elevation areas in the Wind River Range (WRR) of Wyoming (figure 1) exceed 4 km above sea level and are adjacent to areas of accelerating energy development [3]. For example, over 3,000 natural gas wells are being installed in the Green River Basin, directly west of the WRR. Full development of the Jonah gas field could result in the production of 1,480 metric tons/yr of NOx and 25.7 metric tons/yr of SO2 [3].
Figure 1

Location of NADP/NTN and ice-coring sites in Wind River Range, Wyoming.

Thin soils and dilute surface-water systems in high-elevation areas have limited capacities to buffer increased acidity associated with the airborne contaminants of NOx and SO2. Trends in precipitation chemistry at NADP/NTN sites in the western United States have indicated an increase in total N deposition and a decrease in deposition from 1981-1998 [4]. In addition to monitoring trends in N and S deposition, the isotopic composition of snow, firn, and ice has been used to differentiate natural and anthropogenic solute sources. Stable isotope ratios of sulfur in , expressed as δ34S, were monitored in bulk snowpack samples collected from a network of 52 high-elevation sites in the Rocky Mountains from 1993 to 1999 [5]. The δ34S values indicated that snowpack S in high-elevation areas is primarily derived from anthropogenic sources [5].

Changes in δ34S values in firn and ice-core samples have been used to reconstruct changes in sulfate sources to central Asia, Greenland, and Antarctica. The variation in δ34S values in a firn core from central Asia allowed for the identification of S derived from marine evaporites (+15 ‰) during high dust deposition events and anthropogenic emissions (+5.4 ‰) [6]. Preindustrial δ34S signatures in Greenland ice cores were comprised of marine biogenic emissions, continental dust sources, background volcanism, and continental biota [7]. Beginning in 1870 A.D., δ34S signatures in the ice-core samples indicated anthropogenic S sources.

In Antarctica, shallow firn cores collected from the South Pole contained δ34S values that were used to confirm and contrast the different S isotopic signals between the low-latitude Agunge volcanic eruption in 1963 and background marine biogenic sulfate [8]. Composited ice-core samples representing coastal and plateau regions on the Antarctic ice sheet were found to have similar δ34S values over the past 1,100 years, indicative of no temporal change in influencing sources of S [9]. Values of δ34S in two ice cores from east Antarctica over the complete glacial/interglacial cycle were significantly lighter than previous measurements of δ34S from the South Pole [10]. A likely mechanism for the observed isotopic difference was Rayleigh-type fractionation as S species are oxidized and transported toward the East Antarctic Plateau [10]. Measurements of δ34S values in an ice core collected from west Antarctica were found to be a mixture of marine and volcanic S sources during the time period from 1935-1976. [11].

Stable isotopes have also been used to gain a better understanding of N sources in atmospheric deposition. Historical records of the isotopic composition of N2O in trapped gases (ice cores) from Greenland and interstitial air (snowpack) from the South Pole have been used to differentiate between natural and anthropogenic sources [12]. The δ15N value of atmospheric N2O has dropped by 1.7 ‰ during the 20th century, likely due to increasing agricultural activities [12]. In support of these measurements, simulations of N2O(g) have indicated a -1.8 ‰ shift in δ15N over the last two centuries, primarily due to anthropogenic influences [13]. The δ15N of in wet deposition from 33 sites in the northeastern United States was strongly correlated with the location of coal-fired powerplants [14]. Ice-core samples from Greenland indicated decreasing δ15N ( ) values with increasing concentrations; however, more information is needed to confirm this trend and differentiate source area vs. post-depositional processes during the firn-to-ice transition [15]. A more recent ice-core record from Greenland, spanning deposition from 1718 to 2006, revealed a clear trend of decreasing δ15N ( ) values from 11 ‰ (pre-industrial) to -1 ‰ (~1996-2006) [16].

Although previous studies have shown that δ15N ( ) values of snow and ice samples have excellent potential for providing information on sources, post-depositional changes in the concentration and isotopic composition of needs to be considered [17, 18]. Year-round measurement of δ15N ( ) values in snow pits from Dome C, Antarctica, indicated strong enrichment relative to atmospheric and loss of mass from the snow surface due to UV-photolysis [17]. In contrast to the Antarctica results, a similar study in Greenland [18] indicated minimal influence of photolysis on the isotopic composition of δ15N ( ) in firn and ice. One possible reason for the different research results between the two studies may be the higher snow accumulation rates at the Greenland study site [18]. Higher rates of snow accumulation were found to mitigate the magnitude of post-depositional processing and loss of in the snowpack [19].

Glaciers present in the high elevation regions of the WRR, Wyoming, present a unique opportunity to couple short-term (1980 to present) NADP/NTN data (sites WY06 and WY98) trends in the chemistry of atmospheric deposition with similar and longer term data preserved in glacial ice from the nearby UFG (figure 1). The UFG is the only glacier within the continental U.S. where ice cores have been documented to contain paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatological records [2027]. Characteristics present at UFG conducive to preserving paleonvironmental signals include: (1) ice-coring site altitudes that exceed 4 km above sea level (ASL) to minimize meltwater modification of the snow and ice chemistry and (2) large ice thicknesses (ranging from 60 to 172 m in the upper half of the glacier) to provide long-term paleoenvironmental records.

Ice cores exceeding 160 m in length were recovered from UFG in 1991 and 1998 [23, 24]. The 1991 ice core was estimated to contain 250 years of record as determined from carbon-14 dating of an insect leg recovered from near the bottom of the core [23]. This length of record was subsequently confirmed by a higher-resolution chronology established with continuous electrical conductivity measurements [26]. On the basis of these data, ice at the bottom of UFG in proximity to the 1991 and 1998 drilling sites was likely deposited as snow prior to 1710 AD.

The overall objective of this paper is to demonstrate the effectiveness of using the isotopic composition and concentration of and in ice-core samples collected from the UFG to supplement and extend existing NADP/NTN records. Specific objectives are to: (1) determine atmospheric deposition sources since the late 1940s by determining the isotopic values of δ34S ( ) and δ15N ( ) in ice-core samples; (2) reconstruct changes in and wet deposition rates from ice-core samples representative of snow deposited from the early-1950s to early-1990s; and (3) couple the results from objectives 1 and 2 with existing NADP/NTN deposition records and NOX/SO2 emission records to identify processes controlling long-term trends in the loading of S and N at high-elevation sites.



Ice cores were collected from UFG in 1991 and 1998 using a thermal drill as described in [23]. The ice cores were collected in 1- and 2-m segments. On-site processing of the cores included visual inspection, logging, and density determinations by personnel wearing Tyvek suits and powder-free Latex gloves. The cores were sealed in polyethylene bags, placed in plastic core tubes, and stored in snow vaults until removal from the site to a freezer truck via a 10-minute helicopter flight. The UFG ice cores are currently archived at the National Ice Core Laboratory (NICL) in Lakewood, Colorado.


Ice-core samples were melted according to strict protocols [21] to minimize sample contamination. Ice cores were subsampled using a bandsaw frequently cleaned with ethanol in cold room laboratories at NICL. Multiple core sections from each interval were composited in order to obtain sufficient S and N mass for isotopic analyses. The surface ice from each subsample was scraped away with a stainless steel microtome. Each ice sample was thoroughly rinsed with ultrapure (18.0 megaohm) deionized water and placed in a prerinsed and covered plastic container. Each sample was allowed to melt at room temperature for one hour (or until approximately 15 mL of meltwater had accumulated). After this initial melt period the sample was rinsed in the accumulated meltwater, and the melt was discarded. The remaining sample was allowed to melt in the covered plastic container at room temperature.

For S isotopic analysis, meltwater volumes corresponding to 90-100 micrograms of sulfate (0.5-6 L) were evaporated to dryness within covered canisters flushed by dry nitrogen. The samples were transferred from 4-L Pyrex beakers to smaller Savillex beakers when they had been reduced to about 100 mL. Drydown salts were redissolved in a few mL of deionized water which was pipetted into tin capsules and evaporated a few hundred microliters at a time. One to 2 mg of powdered V2O5 was added and the capsules were pinched closed.

Filled capsules were combusted in an elemental analyzer to produce SO2 for analysis by isotope ratio monitoring using a Micromass Optima [28]. The elemental analyzer-mass spectrometer system was standardized using reference materials previously calibrated against IAEA-SO-5 and NBS 127 assuming δ34S values for them of -34.05 and 21.1 ‰, respectively [29]. To evaluate accuracy, synthetic Ca2+-Na+-K+ solutions were prepared with reagents of known isotopic composition and then dried and analyzed. Sodium-dominated solutions gave δ34S values indistinguishable from the reagents used to prepare them; however, solutions with Na+:Ca2+ ratios equivalent to the UFG samples were about 1 ‰ low. The cause of this inaccuracy is uncertain. No attempt was made to correct the UFG measurements for a possible similar inaccuracy. The S isotopic compositions are reported in δ-notation relative to Vienna Canon Diablo troilite. Reproducibility for triplicate analysis of sample ISO-1 was ±0.4 ‰ (one standard deviation).

For N isotopic analysis, meltwater volumes corresponding to 1.2 micrograms of nitrate (6-80 mL) were evaporated to <5 mL by the same method used for sulfur. Nitrous oxide (N2O) was produced by the denitrifier method using the Pseudomonas chlororaphis bacterium (ATCC 43928) [30, 31], and the isotope ratios were measured using a ThermoFinnigan Delta Plus XL equipped with an autosampler and gas bench device. To calibrate the measurements and correct for media blanks, aliquots of the reference materials USGS32 KNO315N = 180 ‰), USGS34 KNO315N = -1.8 ‰), and USGS35 NaNO315N = 2.7 ‰) were analyzed along with the unknowns.

Because the in UFG samples is atmospheric in origin, it is likely to contain excess 17O (commonly expressed as values of Δ17O greater than zero) [32]. For single bacterium experiments like those carried out in this study, excess 17O leads to δ15N results that are erroneously high by 1 ‰ per 18.8 ‰ increase in Δ17O [33]. Our δ15N determinations for USGS35, which has a Δ17O value of 21.1 ‰, showed an error corresponding to 1 ‰ per 18.3 ‰ increase in Δ17O. The highest Δ17O values that have been observed to date in modern and ancient atmospheric nitrate are 39 and 20 ‰, respectively [3436], and the results of a global model for the modern atmosphere suggest that Δ17O of atmospheric nitrate is unlikely to exceed about 30 ‰ in the western United States [37]. If the in UFG samples has Δ17O values of 30 ‰ or lower, the error in our δ15N results is no more than 1.6 ‰. The N isotopic compositions are reported in δ-notation relative to atmospheric N2(g). Reproducibility for triplicate analysis of USGS34 was ±0.27‰ (one standard deviation).

After filtration with 0.45 μm disposable polysulfone filters, a modified ion chromatography procedure for low ionic strength samples was used for the analysis of and [38]. A Dionex DX-120 was configured with a 250 μL loop to increase instrument sensitivity. Ten percent of each sample batch consisted of quality control standards. Seven-point calibration curves covering the range of solutes being measured were run daily. Each batch contained sets of blanks (18.2 megaohm deionized water) and a series of USGS standard water reference samples (SRWS) at intervals of approximately every 10 ice-core samples. SRWS and blanks were monitored during sample runs. If the SRWS were not within 10% of expected values or the blanks were above detection limits, the sample run results were rejected and repeated.

All chemical data from the ice-core analyses can be found in additional file 1.

Results and Discussion

Ice-core chronology

Tritium, chloride-36, and carbon-14 age-dating methods [23, 39] were combined with the timing of major volcanic eruption signals that were evident in the core [26] to establish an ice-core chronology. The polynomial fit for the age-depth profile in the ice core [26] was determined to be
where D is depth below glacier surface, in m. This age-depth profile is in excellent agreement with known time horizons in the ice core that include (1) 1963 tritium and 1958 chloride-36 peaks from above-ground nuclear testing; (2) 1883 Krakatau volcanic eruption; (3) 1815 Tambora volcanic eruption; and (4) 1729 (± 95 years) carbon-14 age date of an insect leg entrapped in the ice (figure 2).
Figure 2

Plot of reported volcanic events and isotopic age dates used to generate a polynomial fit for an age-depth profile of the Upper Fremont Glacier ice core collected in 1991 [26], Wind River Range, Wyoming. A slightly modified age-depth profile was developed for the 1998 ice core (DH-98-4) to account for the additional snow deposited between 1991 and 1998.

Variation of δ34S in ice

Seven composite ice-core samples and one snow sample collected from UFG were analyzed for δ34S (figure 3). The ice-core samples represent a time period from approximately 1946 to 1988 and δ34S values in the ice ranged from 5.1 to 8.1 ‰. Sulfate in snow and corresponding glacier ice can be derived from a variety of natural and anthropogenic sources such as sea-salt aerosols, biogenic emissions, entrained dust particles, fossil fuel combustion, and metal smelting. Volcanic eruptions can also provide an intermittent short-term source of atmospheric . The highest δ34S value in the UFG ice-core samples was associated with snow deposited primarily during 1980, coinciding with the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, Washington, during May 1980. Comparison of the δ34S value in the ice core (8.1 ‰) with a mean δ34S value of volcanic ash from the 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens (8.3 ‰) [40] indicates a similar isotopic composition. Corresponding geochemical signatures of the 1980 Mt. St. Helens volcanic eruption in the UFG ice-core samples include elevated Hg concentrations [27] and elevated electrical conductivity, , and Cl- [26]. Ice samples collected from a 1980 deposition horizon on Knifepoint Glacier, approximately 4 km southwest of UFG, contained ash material that had morphology and chemical composition similar to Mt. St. Helens ash [20].
Figure 3

Comparison of δ 34 S in ice-core and snow samples collected from Upper Fremont Glacier with δ 34 S values of potential sulfate sources to the Wind River Range, Wyoming. Data for comparisons compiled from [5, 4045].

Except for the elevated δ34S value in the layer corresponding to atmospheric deposition from Mt. St. Helens, the remaining δ34S values in the ice-core samples ranged from 5.1 to 6.8 ‰ (figure 3). The δ34S values in the UFG ice core were substantially enriched relative to biogenic sources (-2.4 ‰) [41] and massive sulfide deposits in Arizona (0 ‰) [42]. The δ34S values of massive sulfide deposits were assumed to be representative of smelter emissions associated with ore processing in Arizona and New Mexico [5]. Marine aerosols, which have a δ34S value of +20 ‰ [5], could not be a large source of to UFG due to the much lighter δ34S isotopic values found in the ice.

The WRR and UFG are in close proximity to large expanses of arid and semi-arid lands composed of soils, sedimentary rocks, and dry lakebeds containing gypsum and anhydrite [5]. Therefore, dry deposition of dust on the surface of UFG during the summer and dust solute sources associated with snow deposition could comprise a large natural source and corresponding isotopic signal. Marine and non-marine evaporites have δ34S values that range from +9 to +33 ‰ [43] and are much heavier relative to δ34S values found in UFG ice-core samples (figure 3). Median δ34S values of water soluble from dry lake beds in arid regions of the southwestern US are +7.5 ‰ [44], slightly enriched relative to non-volcanic δ34S values in the UFG ice core. Based on the isotopic composition of snowpack samples collected from high-elevation sites in northern New Mexico and southern Colorado from 1993 to 1999, it was concluded that soils and lakebeds were not dominant sources [5]. The mean δ34S of snow collected from Wyoming during 1993-1999 had the same δ34S as a snow sample collected from the surface of UFG in 2001 (figure 3). This suggests that soils and lakebeds are not dominant sources; however, two of the δ34S samples (mid-1960s and mid-1970s) may reflect contributions from lake-bed sulfate.

Coal from southern Wyoming, commonly used in electricity-producing power plants in close proximity to UFG, has a mean δ34S composition of 5.1 ‰ for organic S [45], similar in isotopic composition to the δ34S values in ice-core samples from UFG (figure 3). Assuming limited isotopic fractionation during coal combustion, the δ34S isotopic composition in the ice-core samples indicates that coal-fired powerplant emissions could be a dominant source of S deposition to high-elevation areas of the WRR. Based on U.S. emissions data compiled for 1998, electric utilities contributed the majority of SO2 emissions, representing 68% of total national SO2 emissions [46]. Coal combustion comprised over 90% of electric utility emissions on a national scale.

Variation of δ15N in ice

Seven composite ice-core samples representing the time period of deposition from 1951 to 1988 were collected from UFG and analyzed for δ15N in (figure 4). The δ15N values in the ice were all negative and had similar isotopic composition, ranging from -5.9 to -3.2 ‰. Nitrate in snow and corresponding glacier ice can be derived from a variety of natural (lightning, biogenic soil processes, and wildfires) and anthropogenic sources (generation of electricity, industrial processes, and vehicle exhaust) [14]. The mean δ15N value in the UFG ice-core samples (-4.0 ‰, n = 7) was equal to the mean δ15N value of six archived precipitation samples collected during 2000 at NADP/NTN site WY98 (C. Kendall, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 2008). The similarity in mean δ15N values between the ice-core and NADP samples suggests similar source(s).
Figure 4

Comparison of δ 15 N in ice-core samples collected from Upper Fremont Glacier with δ 15 N values of potential nitrate sources and site-specific data collected from Wyoming NADP/NTN site WY98. Data for comparisons compiled from [4750], and C. Kendall, USGS, written commun., 2008.

Ice-core δ15N values were compared with δ15N values from potential NOX sources from previously published data (figure 4). Although δ15N values from coal deposits in the western U.S. were not available, ice-core δ15N values were substantially lighter than δ15N values of NOX from coal-fired powerplants in South Africa [47], simulated lightning [48], or kerogen in North American coal deposits [49]. Ice-core δ15N values were significantly enriched relative to soil-released biogenic NO values [50]. The δ15N of the ice-core samples all fall within the δ15N values expected from vehicle emissions [47, 50]. Based on national NOX emission data compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [46], on- and off-road vehicle emissions comprised 53% of NOX emissions during 1998 as opposed to electrical generation (25%) and industrial combustion (12%). Data compiled for the western United States indicate that on- and off-road mobile sources comprise 67% of the anthropogenic NOx emissions, with stationary sources comprising only 22% of the anthropogenic NOx emissions [51]. Based on the comparisons of the tightly constrained UFG ice-core δ15N values with existing end-member data, it appears likely that vehicular NOX emissions may have a large impact on sources in snowfall deposited in the WRR of Wyoming.

The ice-core results conflict with a recent study in the more densely populated eastern United States where it was found that NOx emissions from stationary sources were strongly correlated with spatial variation of δ15N ( ) in wet deposition [14]. One possible reason for the observed discrepancy with the ice-core results could be the lower number of stationary NOx sources in the western United States to support the lower population density. Additional δ15N values of NOX emissions from regional biogenic sources, as well as natural gas production facilities and coal-fired power plants in the western U.S. are needed to better assess sources.

Reconstruction of and deposition

In addition to the S and N isotope data, the ice-core samples were used to provide an archive of annual and deposition amounts that could be used to qualitatively extend the NADP/NTN records to the early-1950s. Dissolved (0.45 μm) and concentrations from the 1998 ice-core samples (site DH-98-4) were used in combination with the average ice-core density value of 0.90 g/cm3 (n = 12) to calculate deposition masses in kilograms/hectare (kg/ha). The age of each ice-core sample from site DH-98-4 was determined from the modified age-depth profile developed for the 1991 ice core to account for the additional snow deposited between 1991 and 1998. Once an age was assigned to each ice-core sample, the and masses from the same year were summed to represent an annual deposition mass that could be directly compared to the NADP/NTN deposition data from sites WY06 and WY98 [52]. Annual and masses in kg/ha were calculated for snow deposited on UFG from 1951 through 1993 (figure 5).
Figure 5

Nitrate (A) and sulfate (B) annual wet deposition at NADP/NTN sites WY06 and WY98 and total deposition calculated from ice core DH-98-4 compared to total U.S. emissions of NO x (A) and SO 2 (B) from 1950 to 1998 [46].

Comparison of the wet deposition data from the NADP/NTN sites to UFG data suggests that deposition in the WRR may have been less prior to 1980 (figure 5). During the time period of overlapping data there is some general agreement between UFG and NADP/NTN annual deposition masses (i.e. 1985, 1988, 1992, 1993, and 1994). Other years of overlapping data indicate substantially less annual deposition from the ice-core record relative to NADP/NTN sites WY06 and WY98 (i.e. 1982, 1983, 1984, 1990, and 1991).

A number of reasons may explain the time periods when deposition rates recorded in the UFG ice core were different than the measured deposition rates at the NADP/NTN sites. At 4,000 m ASL, the UFG ice-coring site is subject to wind erosion of previously deposited snow and the corresponding deposition mass. An on-site snow depth sensor on UFG was used in combination with snow-density measurements to document significant snow removal by wind events after deposition [25]. Data collected on UFG during 1999-2000 indicated that the snow removal events were less during the spring, likely due to warmer air temperatures, resulting in higher-density snowfall. At an elevation of 4 km ASL, UFG is subject to free tropospheric and sometimes stratospheric air, increasing the likelihood of receiving atmospheric deposition from hemispheric sources relative to the lower elevation NADP/NTN sites. The NOx produced from the oxidation of nitrous oxide in the stratosphere should contain a δ15N of ~ 19 ‰ [35], which is significantly enriched relative to the δ15N ( ) values observed in the UFG ice-core samples (figure 4).

Post-depositional elution of solutes from the snowpack deposited on UFG could also contribute to lower masses relative to similar time periods at the NADP/NTN sites. However, chemical and isotopic analyses of ice from both cores indicate the low-resolution preservation of historical records of environmental change, including above-ground nuclear weapons testing, air temperature, volcanic eruptions, and the chemical quality of atmospheric deposition such as sub-μg/L concentrations of atmospheric mercury [2027].

The deposition data from UFG (1951 through 1993) indicates an increasing trend in deposition until approximately 1980 (figure 5). Beginning in 1980, both the NADP/NTN (1980 to 2006) sites and the UFG data indicate slightly decreasing to stable deposition. During the time period of overlapping deposition data from both UFG and NADP/NTN sites, there is only one year where similar deposition masses occur (1986). All remaining years of overlapping data indicate substantially less annual deposition from the ice-core record relative to the NADP/NTN sites. Similar processes controlling deposition also are likely affecting the annual deposition rates on UFG relative to the NADP/NTN sites.

The annual and deposition data from UFG was compared with total U.S. emissions of NOX and SO2 from 1950 to 1998 (figure 5) as compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Although this comparison does not address the overall higher NOX and SO2 emissions in the eastern U.S. relative to Wyoming deposition rates, it does provide a historical perspective on the initiation of the NADP/NTN program relative to total emission amounts. The effect of sharply increasing NOX and SO2 emissions from 1950 to the mid-1970s occurred before the beginning of the NADP/NTN program; however, the UFG ice-core samples provide a record of the and deposition effects during this time of increasing emissions (figure 5). Although post-depositional elution processes may have decreased the total and masses, the trends in deposition from 1950 to the mid-1970s appear to reflect the sharply increasing U.S. emissions data during this same time period. The NADP/NTN program sites in Wyoming were initiated after the peak national SO2 emissions in 1973 and substantially smaller annual NOX emissions after 1978. The decrease in U.S. SO2 emissions after the early-1970s is not reflected by the UFG ice-core data (figure 5).

Given the observed increase in and deposition in the UFG ice-core samples since the mid-1940s, it is unclear why no distinctive temporal trend in the isotopic composition is observed during the same time period. This may suggest that most of the and deposition to the WRR since the mid-1940s has been dominated by anthropogenic inputs from a common source and any increases in deposition amounts contain similar isotopic signatures. Additional reasons for the lack of an isotopic trend could include: (1) limited period of record starting after the existence of anthropogenic inputs; (2) large sample composites for isotope samples covering multiple years of deposition that mask finer scale trends evident in the and deposition data; (3) varying deposition amounts from local, regional, and global sources; and (4) isotopic fractionation from postdepositional processes in the firn and ice. Additional studies are needed to assess the impact of postdepostional processes on the preservation of δ34S ( ) and δ15N ( ) values at the UFG coring site. Recent work at the Summit site, Greenland, found a potentially minimal influence of photolysis on the isotopic composition of in firn and ice, in part due to high accumulation rates [18].

Isotopic analyses from other sections of the UFG ice core (including pre-industrial) would provide additional insight into the existence of isotopic trends. Unfortunately, the low concentration of and combined with an insufficient amount of ice-core samples representing atmospheric deposition prior to ~ 1945 does not allow for sufficient sample mass to support S and N isotopic analyses. Despite this short-coming, results from these ice-core data provide insight to the long-term wet deposition of and in pristine areas of the western United States that were previously not available.


Glaciers in the WRR present a unique opportunity to couple short-term (1980 to present) NADP/NTN data trends in the chemistry of atmospheric deposition with longer-term data, including stable isotope data, preserved in glacial ice. The δ34S values in seven ice-core samples representing snowfall deposited from approximately 1946 to 1988 were similar, ranging from 5.1 to 8.1 ‰. The highest δ34S value in the UFG ice-core samples was associated with snow deposited primarily during 1980 and coincident with the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, Washington, during May 1980. The measured δ34S value of 8.1 ‰ in the ice core was in close agreement with the mean δ34S value of 8.3 ‰ of volcanic ash from the 1980 eruption. The remaining δ34S values from ice-core samples were substantially enriched relative to biogenic sources and slightly depleted relative to δ34S values of water-soluble from dry lake beds in arid regions of the southwestern United States. Coal used in power plants in close proximity to UFG was similar in δ34S isotopic composition suggesting that power plant emissions may be a dominant source of S deposition to the WRR.

The mean δ15N value in the UFG ice-core samples (-4.0 ‰, n = 7) was equal to the mean δ15N value of six archived precipitation samples collected during 2000 at NADP/NTN site WY98, suggesting similar source(s). Ice-core δ15N values were substantially depleted relative to δ15N values of NOX from coal-fired powerplants, North American kerogen deposits, or simulated lightning and were substantially enriched relative to soil-released N. The ice-core samples were similar in isotopic composition to δ15N values measured from vehicle emissions. This similarity in isotopic composition is consistent with NOX emission data compiled for the U.S. during 1998 that indicates vehicle emissions as the dominant source of NOX.

Comparison of and wet deposition data from the NADP/NTN sites to UFG data suggests an increasing trend in annual deposition from 1950 to the installation of the NADP/NTN sites in western Wyoming during the early-1980s. Post-depositional elution processes may have decreased the total and masses preserved in UFG ice-core samples; however, the ice-core deposition data reflect the sharply increasing U.S. emissions from 1950 to the mid-1970s. Integration of the UFG ice-core data with the existing NADP/NTN data provides a longer-term, yet more qualitative, historical perspective on atmospheric deposition in the WRR.



Use of brand names in this article is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the USGS. Funding for this study was provided by the USGS and National Atmospheric Deposition/National Trends Network. Analytical assistance by Craig A. Stricker and Cayce A. Gulbransen during the isotopic analyses is greatly appreciated. The sharing of isotopic data derived from monitoring sites in Wyoming by Carol Kendall is gratefully acknowledged. The manuscript was improved substantially from technical reviews by Philip Gardner and Anthony Ranalli (U.S. Geological Survey), Tyler Cruickshank (Utah Department of Environmental Quality), and two anonymous reviewers.

Authors’ Affiliations

U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center


  1. Fenn M, Haeuber R, Tonnesen G, Baron J, Grossman-Clarke S, Hope D, Jaffe D, Copeland S, Geiser L, Rueth H, Sickman J: Nitrogen emissions, deposition, and monitoring in the western United States. BioScience. 2003, 53: 391-403. 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0391:NEDAMI]2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ingersoll G, Mast M, Nanus L, Handran H, Manthorne D, Hultstrand D: Rocky Mountain snowpack chemistry at selected sites. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1045. 2007, 15-Google Scholar
  3. Bureau of Land Management: Jonah infill drilling project, final Environmental Impact Statement. accessed February 2011., []
  4. Nilles M, Conley B: Changes in the chemistry of precipitation in the United States, 1981-1998. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2001, 130: 409-414. 10.1023/A:1013889302895.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mast M, Turk J, Ingersoll G, Clow D, Kester C: Use of stable isotopes to identify sources of sulfate in Rocky Mountain snowpacks. Atmos Environ. 2001, 35: 3303-3313. 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00507-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kruetz K, Sholkovitz E: Major element, rare earth element, and sulfur isotopic composition of a high elevation firn core: Sources and transport of mineral dust in central Asia. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 1. 2000, Paper number 2000GC000082.Google Scholar
  7. Patris N, Delmas R, Legrand M, Angelis M, Ferron F, Stievenard M, Jouzel J: First sulfur isotope measurements in central Greenland ice cores along the preindustrial and industrial periods. J Geophys Res. 2002, 107: 4115-4120. 10.1029/2001JD000672.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Patris D, Delmas R, Jouzel J: Isotopic signatures of sulfur in shallow Antarctic ice cores. J Geophys Res. 2002, 105: 7071-7078. 10.1029/1999JD900974.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Jonsell U, Hansson M, Morth C, Torssander P: Sulfur isotopic signals in two shallow ice cores from Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica. Tellus. 2005, 57B: 341-350.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Alexander B, Thiemens M, Farquhar J, Kaufman A, Savarino J, Delmas R: East Antarctic ice core sulfur isotope measurements over a complete glacial-interglacial cycle. J Geophys Res. 2003, 108: 4786-4793. 10.1029/2003JD003513.Google Scholar
  11. Pruett L, Kruetz K, Wadleigh M, Mayewski P, Kurbatov A: Sulfur isotopic measurements from a West Antarctic ice core: Implications for sulfate source and transport. Ann Glac. 2004, 39: 161-168. 10.3189/172756404781814339.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sowers T, Rodebaugh A, Yoshida N, Toyoda S: Extending records of the isotopic composition of the atmospheric N2O back to 1800 A.D. from air trapped in snow at the South Pole and the Greenland Ice Sheet Project II ice core. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2002, 16: 1129-1138. 10.1029/2002GB001911.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Rahn T, Wahlen M: A reassessment of the global isotopic budget of atmospheric nitrous oxide. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2000, 14: 537-543. 10.1029/1999GB900070.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliott E, Kendall C, Wankel S, Burns D, Boyer E, Harlin K, Bain D, Butler T: Nitrogen isotopes as indicators of NOx source contributions to atmospheric nitrate deposition across the midwestern and northeastern United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2007, 41: 7661-7667. 10.1021/es070898t.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Freyer H, Kobel K, Delmas R, Kley D, Legrand M: First results of 15N/14N ratios in nitrate from alpine and polar cores. Tellus Ser B. 1996, 48B: 93-105. 10.1034/j.1600-0889.1996.00009.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hastings M, Jarvis J, Steig E: Anthropogenic impacts on nitrogen isotopes of ice-core nitrate. Science. 2009, 324: 1288-10.1126/science.1170510.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Frey M, Savarino J, Morin S, Erbland J, Martins J: Photolysis imprint in the nitrate stable isotope signal in snow and atmosphere of East Antarctica and implications for reactive nitrogen cycling. Atmos Chem. 2009, 9: 8681-8696. 10.5194/acp-9-8681-2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Jarvis J, Hastings M, Steig E, Kunasek S: Isotopic ratios in gas-phase HNO3 at Summit, Greenland. J Geophys Res. 2009, 114: 17301-17314. 10.1029/2009JD012134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rothlisberger R, Hutterli M, Wolff E, Mulvaney R, Fischer H, Bigler M, Goto-Azuma K, Hansson M, Ruth U, Siggaard-Andersen M, Steffensen J: Nitrate in Greenland and Antarctica ice cores: a detailed description of postdepositional processes. Ann Glaciol. 2002, 35: 209-216. 10.3189/172756402781817220.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Naftz D, Rice J, Ranville J: Glacial-ice composition--A potential long-term record of the chemistry of atmospheric deposition, Wind River Range, Wyoming. Water Resour Res. 1991, 27: 1231-1238. 10.1029/91WR00687.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Naftz D: Ice-core records of the chemical quality of atmospheric deposition and climate from mid-latitude glaciers, Wind River Range, Wyoming. Colorado School of Mines. 1993, Golden, Colorado, Ph.D. thesis,Google Scholar
  22. Naftz D, Schuster P, Reddy M: Assessment of spatial variability of major-ion concentrations and δ18O values in surface snow, Upper Fremont Glacier, Wyoming, U.S.A. Nordic Hydrology. 1994, 25: 371-388.Google Scholar
  23. Naftz D, Klusman R, Michel R, Schuster P, Reddy M, Taylor H, Yanosky T, McConnaughey E: Little Ice Age evidence from a south-central North American ice core, U.S.A. Arct Alp Res. 1996, 28: 35-41. 10.2307/1552083.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Naftz D, Susong D, Schuster P, Cecil L, Dettinger M, Michel R, Kendall C: Ice-core evidence of rapid air temperature increases since 1960 in alpine areas of the Wind River Range, Wyoming, United States. J Geophys Res. 2002, 107: 4171-4186. 10.1029/2001JD000621.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Naftz D, Susong D, Cecil L, Schuster P: Variations between δ18O in recently deposited snow and onsite air temperature, Upper Fremont Glacier, Wyoming. Earth Paleoenvironments: Records Preserved in Mid- and Low-Latitude Glaciers. Edited by: Cecil L, Green J, Thompson L. 2004, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, 9: 217-234. full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Schuster P, White D, Naftz D, Cecil L: Chronological refinement of an ice core record at upper Fremont Glacier in south central North America. J Geophys Res. 2000, 105: 4657-4666. 10.1029/1999JD901095.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Schuster P, Krabbenhoft D, Naftz D, Cecil L, Olson M, Dewild J, Susong D, Green J: Atmospheric mercury deposition during the last 270 years: A glacial ice core of natural and anthropogenic sources. Environ Sci Technol. 2002, 36: 2303-2310. 10.1021/es0157503.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Giesemann A, Jager H, Norman A, Krouse H, Brand W: On-line sulfur isotope determination using an elemental analyzer coupled to a mass spectrometer. Anal Chem. 1994, 66: 2816-2819. 10.1021/ac00090a005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Coplen T, Hopple J, Bohlke J, Peiser H, Rieder S, Krouse H, Rosman K, Ding T, Vocke R, Revesz K, Lamberty A, Taylor P, De Bievre P: Compilation of minimum and maximum isotope ratios of selected elements in naturally occurring terrestrial materials and reagents. 2002, 98-U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4222Google Scholar
  30. Sigman D, Casciotti K, Andreani M, Barford C, Galanter M, Bohlke J: A bacterial method for the nitrogen isotopic analysis of nitrate in seawater and freshwater. Anal Chem. 2001, 73: 4145-4153. 10.1021/ac010088e.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Casciotti K, Sigman D, Hastings M, Bohlke J, Hikert A: Measurement of the oxygen isotopic composition of nitrate in seawater and freshwater using the denitrifier method. Anal Chem. 2002, 74: 4905-4912. 10.1021/ac020113w.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Michalski G, Scott Z, Kabiling M, Thiemens M: First measurements and modeling of δ17O in atmospheric nitrate. Geophys Res Lett. 2003, 30: 1870-1873. 10.1029/2003GL017015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Coplen T, Bohlke J, Casciotti K: Using dual-bacterial denitrification to improve δ15N determinations of nitrates containing mass-independent 17O. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2004, 18: 245-250. 10.1002/rcm.1318.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Michalski G, Bohlke J, Thiemens M: Long term atmospheric deposition as the source of nitrate and other salts in the Atacama Desert, Chile: New evidence from mass-independent oxygen isotopic compositions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2004, 68: 4023-4038. 10.1016/j.gca.2004.04.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Savarino J, Kaiser J, Morin S, Sigman D, Thiemens T: Nitrogen and oxygen isotopic constraints on the origin of atmospheric nitrate in coastal Antarctica. Atmos Chem Phys. 2007, 7: 1925-1945. 10.5194/acp-7-1925-2007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Morin S, Savarino J, Frey M, Yan N, Bekki S, Bottenheim J, Martins J: Tracing the origin and fate of NOx in the Arctic atmosphere using stable isotopes in nitrate. Science. 2008, 322: 730-732. 10.1126/science.1161910.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Alexander B, Hastings M, Allman D, Dachs J, Thornton J, Kunasek S: Quantifying atmospheric nitrate formation pathways based on a global model of the oxygen isotopic composition (Δ17O) of atmospheric nitrate. Atmos Chem Phys. 2007, 9: 5043-56. 10.5194/acp-9-5043-2009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Fishman M, Friedman L: Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments. 545-U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations 1989, Book 5, Chap. A1
  39. Cecil L, Vogt S: Identification of bomb-produced chlorine-36 in mid-latitude glacial ice of North America. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 1997, 123: 287-289. 10.1016/S0168-583X(96)00717-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bindeman I, Eiler J, Wing B, Farquhar J: Rare sulfur and triple oxygen isotope geochemistry of volcanogenic sulfate aerosols. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2007, 71: 2326-2343. 10.1016/j.gca.2007.01.026.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Nriagu J, Holdway D, Coker R: Biogenic sulfur and the acidity of rainfall in remote areas of Canada. Science. 1987, 237: 1189-1192. 10.1126/science.237.4819.1189.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Eastoe C, Bustin M, Hurlbut D, Orr R: Sulfur isotopes in Early Proterozoic volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits - new data from Arizona and implications for ocean chemistry. Precambrian Res. 1990, 46: 353-364. 10.1016/0301-9268(90)90021-H.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Claypool G, Holser W, Kaplan I, Sakai H, Zak I: The age curves of sulfur and oxygen isotopes in marine sulfate and their mutual interpretation. Chem Geol. 1980, 28: 199-260. 10.1016/0009-2541(80)90047-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Schlesinger W, Peterjohn W: Ion and sulfate-isotope ratios in arid soils subject to wind erosion in the southwestern USA. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1988, 52: 54-58. 10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200010010x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Hackley C, Anderson T: Sulfur isotopic variations in low-sulfur coals from the Rocky Mountain region. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1986, 50: 1703-1713. 10.1016/0016-7037(86)90132-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. U.S Environmental Protection Agency: National air pollutant emission trends, 1900 - 1998. 2000, Research Triangle Park, NC, EPA-454/R-00-002,Google Scholar
  47. Heaton T: 15N/14N ratios of NOx from vehicle engines and coal-fired power stations. Tellus Ser B. 1990, 42B: 304-307.Google Scholar
  48. Hoering T: The isotopic composition of ammonia and nitrate ion in rain. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1957, 12: 7-102. 10.1016/0016-7037(57)90021-2.Google Scholar
  49. Boudou J, Schimmelmann A, Ader M, Mastalerz M, Sebilo M, Léon G: Organic nitrogen chemistry during low-grade metamorphism. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2008, 72: 1199-1221. 10.1016/j.gca.2007.12.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Li D, Wang X: Nitrogen isotopic signature of soil-released nitric oxide (NO) after fertilizer application. Atmos Envrion. 2008, 42: 4747-4754. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.042.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Fenn M, Haeuber R, Tonnesen G, Baron J, Grossman-Clarke S, Hope D, Jaffe D, Copeland S, Geiser L, Rueth H, Sickman J: Nitrogen emissions, deposition, and monitoring in the western United States. BioScience. 2003, 53: 391-403. 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0391:NEDAMI]2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. National Atmospheric Deposition Program: NADP/NTN wet deposition data for Wyoming. accessed February 2011., []


© Naftz et al; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.